Skip to main content
Glama
Sign In
ThoughtProof

thoughtproof-mcp

Official
by ThoughtProof
OverviewSchemaSourceRelated ServersDiscussionsAdmin
JavaScript
Remote

Related Servers

Alternatives to thoughtproof-mcp

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • Thoughtproof-mcp

      ThoughtProof
      A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Adversarial multi-model reasoning verification for AI agents. Claude, Grok, and DeepSeek challenge each decision — returns ALLOW or HOLD with JWKS-signed attestation. x402-gated on Base.
      3 npm
      MIT

    • SENTINEL

      teodorofodocrispin-cmyk
      F
      license
      A
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Agent-Level Transaction Safety Oracle. Before an AI agent signs a blockchain transaction, it returns a SAFE/UNSAFE verdict with a SENTINEL Score (AAA-D) and risk flags. Pay-per-call $0.005 USDC via x402 on Base.
      1
      -

    • verify402-mcp

      a32116150-ctrl
      A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      A
      maintenance
      Enables AI agents to run a free fail-closed preflight gate on x402 payment challenges and transactions before signing, plus five USDC-paid on-chain truth checks covering arbitrage profitability, token safety, swap routing, quote validation, and trade sizing. Each check returns a verdict with pinned-block evidence and a verifiable receipt.
      Apache 2.0

    • veristat

      originallgb
      A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Enables agents to submit claims, plans, or drafts for evaluation by a panel of frontier models from multiple vendors, receiving a structured consensus verdict with dissent, paid per call via x402 using USDC on Base without needing vendor accounts.
      1
      Functional Source , Version 1.1, MIT Future

    • EthersFlow MCP Server

      Ethersflow
      A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      A
      maintenance
      Enables AI agents to verify proposed actions through federated adversarial consensus among multiple LLMs, providing Ed25519-signed attestations to prevent hallucinations, unverified counterparties, and compliance risks before execution.
      1
      MIT
    Deploy Server
    One endpoint for every MCP toolRayrun runs every MCP server behind one URL and holds the credentials. Each call is decided per client, tool, and argument, then recorded.ray.runAd

    TDQS

    C2/5.0

    Scored across 5 tools

    Disambiguation1/5

    verify_decision and verify_before_action are exact duplicates of the same tool exposed as separate entries, and verify_claim/verify_trade also overlap with the general verification concept. An agent cannot reliably distinguish which verification tool to call.

    Naming Consistency3/5

    Most tools follow a verify_* pattern, but check_agent_score breaks it, and verify_before_action is just an alias of verify_decision rather than a distinct operation. The convention is readable but not cleanly consistent.

    Tool Count4/5

    Five tools is a reasonable size for a focused verification server, though two are duplicates and three lack descriptions, so the effective distinct surface is smaller than the count suggests.

    Completeness2/5

    The core pre-action verification gate is described, but verify_claim, verify_trade, and check_agent_score have no descriptions, making their coverage unknowable. There are also no tools for managing receipts, reviewing prior objections, or repairing blocked decisions beyond the inline repair hints.

    Maintenance

    ActivityActive
    ResponsivenessWithin a week

    Resources