Skip to main content
Glama

Related Servers

Alternatives to Campus Data MCP

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • F
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Enables AI assistants to access authenticated academic databases via browser sessions, eliminating re-login and password exposure.
      16
      -
    • A
      license
      C
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Enables direct access to CSMAR financial databases through Claude Code. Supports 240+ databases including financial statements, stock trading data, and company information with intelligent login management and 11 MCP tools.
      11
      7 npm
      10
      MIT
    • A
      license
      A
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Enables AI agents to search, read, batch-download, and cite CNKI papers using institutional IP recognition or Shibboleth/CARSI single sign-on, with local PDF parsing, caching, and Zotero library lookup.
      17
      MIT
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Provides CSMAR metadata discovery, query feasibility probing, and local materialization for agent workflows, with caching and rate-limit management.
      19 PyPI
      14
      MIT
    • F
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Enables AI agents to search and retrieve academic literature from Web of Science and CNKI, with support for institutional login/SSO. Can be deployed locally on Windows or as a remote Linux server.
      1
      -
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Enables AI agents to read cited stock news, earnings, and filings; screen stocks; run point-in-time backtests; check portfolios; and query a local dashboard across US, A-share, and Hong Kong markets.
      1
      MIT

    TDQS

    A3.6/5.0

    Scored across 9 tools

    Disambiguation4/5

    Each tool targets a distinct operation (open/close lifecycle, inspect, login, search, act, scroll, export, downloads) and descriptions explicitly delimit boundaries, e.g. 'Prefer campus_export for the final export click'. Minor overlap remains since campus_act can click controls while campus_scroll and campus_export are specialized clicks, but the docs clarify the intended routing.

    Naming Consistency4/5

    All tools share a consistent campus_ prefix with snake_case, giving a predictable set. Slight deviation: most are verb-based (open, inspect, search, act, scroll, export, close) but campus_school_login and campus_downloads are compound noun phrases rather than simple verbs.

    Tool Count5/5

    Nine tools is well-scoped for a browser-automation/data-export server, with each tool earning its place across lifecycle, inspection, interaction, and export concerns. No obvious redundancy in count.

    Completeness4/5

    The surface covers the full session lifecycle (open, inspect, interact, export, download receipts, close) with provenance handling. A possible gap is an explicit text-entry tool for arbitrary catalogue fields, though campus_act may cover typing/filters, and login fields are deliberately manual.