A
licenseNot graded
qualityD
maintenanceWebsite health checker MCP server - SEO audit, accessibility scan, broken link detection, performance analysis, and page comparison.
23 npm
3
MIT
@mcpx-digital/site-health
Related Servers
Alternatives to @mcpx-digital/site-health
No user-submitted related servers found.
Related Servers
- AlicenseAqualityBmaintenanceEnables running comprehensive website audits from any MCP client, returning actionable plain-language reports covering SEO, accessibility, performance, security, and more.6MIT
- AlicenseAqualityAmaintenanceProvides on-page SEO analysis via MCP tools, including page audits, schema extraction, robots.txt checks, sitemap parsing, and link analysis. No API keys required; works with any MCP-compatible client.529 npmMIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityBmaintenanceMCP server for Technical SEO DNS record auditing, SOA expiry health checks, SSL/TLS inspection, and HTTP security header analysis. Enables comprehensive security audits and scoring via 10 tools.MIT
- FlicenseNot gradedqualityDmaintenanceEnables scanning web pages and entire domains to identify broken links, checking hyperlinks, images, scripts, and other resources. Provides comprehensive link validation with robots.txt compliance and detailed reporting of link status across single pages or complete websites.-
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityAmaintenanceMCP server for AI search crawler governance, brand safety, and search infrastructure auditing. Provides tools to audit robots.txt, canonical links, sitemaps, redirects, and send IndexNow notifications.MIT
TDQS
A3.9/5.0
Scored across 4 tools
Disambiguation4/5
http_status and broken_links both report HTTP status codes, but one targets a provided list while the other crawls same-origin; descriptions clarify the boundary. seo_basics and security_headers are clearly distinct from each other and the other tools.
Naming Consistency5/5
All tools use consistent snake_case noun phrases (http_status, broken_links, seo_basics, security_headers) with no mixing of conventions. The pattern is predictable and readable.
Tool Count5/5
Four focused tools exactly match the site-health domain, each covering a distinct diagnostic area. No tool feels redundant or out of place for the stated purpose.
Completeness4/5
The set covers status codes, broken links, SEO basics, and security headers, which are core site health checks. However, it lacks common diagnostics like redirect chains, SSL/TLS certificate validity, performance, or accessibility—minor gaps for a comprehensive suite.
Maintenance
ActivityMaintained
ResponsivenessNo issues