Skip to main content
Glama
TheoryofShadows

@mcpx-digital/readme-score

by TheoryofShadows
OverviewSchemaSourceRelated ServersDiscussionsAdmin
JavaScript
Local

Related Servers

Alternatives to @mcpx-digital/readme-score

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • pkg-health-mcp

      orcsnren
      A
      license
      A
      quality
      A
      maintenance
      Scores npm packages, PyPI packages and GitHub repositories 0-100 with an A-F grade and plain-language risks. Scans package.json, requirements.txt and lock files; no API key needed.
      3
      Apache 2.0

    • mcp-repo-health

      ashwinmridul
      A
      license
      B
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Scores local git repositories for README substance, license, package description, TypeScript config, tests, and GitHub Actions, providing a numbered hygiene report.
      2
      MIT

    • md-lint

      TheoryofShadows
      A
      license
      A
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Lints local Markdown files or whole directory trees for broken relative links and images, empty link targets or text, heading hierarchy problems, and common README issues. Only relative targets on disk are checked, so external http(s) links are never fetched.
      2
      MIT

    • MCP Docs Server

      Unlock-MCP
      A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      Provides direct access to local documentation files through simple search and overview tools, enabling LLMs to query project-specific markdown documentation without requiring vector databases or RAG pipelines.
      MIT

    • slop-guard

      Nomura22872
      F
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      A
      maintenance
      Enables agents to score prose from 0-100 for formulaic AI writing tells using purely programmatic rule-based heuristics, with no LLM judge or API calls. Returns a numeric score, band label, specific violations with surrounding context, per-category counts, and concrete advice, and can also analyze a file path directly.
      -
    Deploy Server
    Shareable, User-Owned Context BackendPeople, applications, and agents read, write, and coordinate together in one context lake. Reach it over MCP, a CLI, a Python SDK, or REST.fulcradynamics.comAd

    TDQS

    A3.7/5.0

    Scored across 3 tools

    Disambiguation4/5

    The three tools are mostly easy to distinguish: score_readme produces an overall score, suggest_improvements produces recommendations, and check_readme_links verifies link resolution. However, score_readme already includes relative link validity in its scoring, so an agent could be uncertain whether to call score_readme or check_readme_links for link checking.

    Naming Consistency5/5

    All tool names follow a consistent lowercase snake_case verb-object pattern: score_readme, suggest_improvements, check_readme_links. The naming makes the action and target predictable across the entire set.

    Tool Count5/5

    Three tools is well-scoped for a focused README-scoring server. Each tool covers a distinct stage of the workflow—evaluating, suggesting improvements, and validating links—without unnecessary bloat.

    Completeness5/5

    The toolkit covers the complete local README workflow: scoring, receiving concrete improvement suggestions, and checking relative link integrity. Since the server explicitly targets local README files, there are no major missing operations within its stated scope.

    Maintenance

    ActivitySlowing
    ResponsivenessNo issues

    Resources