Skip to main content
Glama
TheStreamCode

Discord Management MCP

Get Discord role

discord_get_role
Read-onlyIdempotent

Retrieve metadata for a specific Discord role within a guild to inspect its properties and permissions during server management or backup planning.

Instructions

Get Discord role metadata.

Input Schema

NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
roleIdYes
guildIdYes

Output Schema

NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
okYes
errorNo

Schema Changelog

Changes observed during successful MCP inspections.

  1. First observed

TDQS

C2.6/5.0
Behavior2/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

Annotations already declare readOnlyHint, idempotentHint, non-destructive, and openWorldHint, so the safety profile is fully covered. The description adds nothing beyond that: no note on required bot permissions, intents, error behavior for missing roles, or scope of 'metadata'.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness3/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

One short, front-loaded sentence with zero waste, but it is under-specified rather than concise-in-a-good-way; there is no structure beyond the single clause.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness2/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

An output schema exists, so return values need not be described. However, for a two-required-parameter tool with 0% schema description coverage, the absence of any parameter or scope context leaves an agent guessing.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters2/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema description coverage is 0%, so the description carries the burden for guildId and roleId, yet it never mentions them. It gives no hint that roleId is scoped to a guild, or that both are 17-20 digit snowflakes (the pattern exists in the schema but is unexplained).

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose4/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description states a specific verb and resource ('Get Discord role metadata'), making the single-role fetch reasonably clear against siblings like discord_list_roles. It stops short of explicitly contrasting itself with the list/create/update/delete role tools, but the read-one semantics come through.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines2/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

There is no guidance on when to use this instead of discord_list_roles, discord_get_guild, or discord_update_role. The agent must infer the selection rule from the name alone.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.