Skip to main content
Glama

ise_ers_search_tacacscommandsets

Filter and search TACACS+ command sets using ERS filter expressions to locate specific command set configurations within the Cisco ISE deployment.

Instructions

Search/filter TACACS+ Command Sets with ERS filter expressions.

Input Schema

TableJSON Schema
NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
pageNo
sizeNo
sortNo
filterNo
deploymentNoTarget ISE deployment: name ('RADIUS Only'), slug ('radius-only'), or number ('1' or 'Deployment 1'). Omit to use the only/default deployment. Call ise_list_deployments to see the choices.
Behavior2/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

No annotations are provided, so the description carries the full burden of behavioral disclosure. It only mentions 'erase search/filter' mechanics implicitly via 'ERS filter expressions' but doesn't describe pagination behavior, what fields are filterable, whether results are partial or complete, rate-limit implications, or what the response structure looks like. For a search tool with zero annotation coverage, this is a substantial transparency gap.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness4/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is a single efficient sentence that front-loads the core action. It's concise and free of waste, though it does nothing beyond the minimal statement. The brevity is appropriate given the simplicity, but the one-sentence ceiling also limits how much value it can add relative to the schema gaps.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness2/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

There is no output schema and only 20% parameter coverage, so the description must explain more. It fails to describe what a TACACS+ command set is, what the search returns, how filtering works, or how results are structured. For a search tool with 5 parameters, no output schema, and no annotations, 'Search/filter TACACS+ Command Sets with ERS filter expressions' is under-specified for an agent to use it effectively.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters2/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema description coverage is only 20% — only the 'deployment' parameter has a description. The description text itself mentions ERS filter expressions, which relates to the 'filter' parameter, but gives no syntax or format guidance beyond the generic phrase. The 'page', 'size', and 'sort' parameters have no descriptions in the schema and the tool description doesn't compensate for them. The description adds minimal value beyond what the schema provides.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose3/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description states 'Search/filter TACACS+ Command Sets with ERS filter expressions' which names the resource (TACACS+ Command Sets) and the action (Search/filter with ERS expressions). It's clear but generic among siblings — the 'search_' prefix tools (search_downloadableacl, search_allowedprotocols, search_guesttype, etc.) all follow the same pattern, so it doesn't distinguish what is unique about TACACS command sets specifically. It uses a compound verb and identifies the resource, but lacks specificity distinguishing it from its many search_ siblings.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines2/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

No guidance is provided on when to use this tool versus alternatives. Siblings include ise_ers_list_tacacscommandsets, ise_ers_get_tacacscommandsets, and ise_openapi_tacacs_command_sets_list, which are functionally alternatives, but the description gives no direction on choosing among them. The ERS filter-expression mention implies filtering capability but doesn't explain when a filter is appropriate or how it differs from plain listing.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.

Install Server

Other Tools

Latest Blog Posts

MCP directory API

We provide all the information about MCP servers via our MCP API.

curl -X GET 'https://glama.ai/api/mcp/v1/servers/TheOtherBrad/cisco-ise-mcp'

If you have feedback or need assistance with the MCP directory API, please join our Discord server