list_workspaces

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

No annotations are provided, so the description carries the burden. It specifies the return format ('JSON string containing the list of workspaces or error status') but does not explicitly state that the operation is read-only, safe, or requires no special permissions. The verb 'list' implies non-destructive behavior, but this is not made explicit.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is two concise sentences, front-loaded with the core purpose and followed by a return type description. There is no redundant information or verbose explanation.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

For a simple listing tool with no parameters and an output schema present, the description adequately covers the purpose and return format. It is sufficient for an agent to select and invoke the tool correctly, though it lacks explicit mention of any authorization or side-effect behavior.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

There are zero parameters, and the input schema is empty. The description adds no parameter details, but none are needed. The baseline of 4 applies because with no parameters, the description does not need to explain parameter semantics.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states 'List all workspaces in AnythingLLM' with a specific verb and resource, distinguishing it from sibling tools like create_workspace and delete_workspace. There is no ambiguity about the tool's function.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The description implies usage for listing workspaces but provides no explicit guidance on when to use it versus alternatives or any exclusions. It does not mention that creating or deleting workspaces should use sibling tools.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.