Skip to main content
Glama
TheNickSanchez

passkey-mcp

Related Servers

Alternatives to passkey-mcp

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • A
      license
      C
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Enables AI agents to securely store and manage encrypted secrets locally while using them indirectly through environment-variable injection or file writes, so plaintext values never enter the agent's context.
      8
      MIT
    • A
      license
      A
      quality
      F
      maintenance
      A GitHub-native secrets manager that allows AI assistants to securely manage, generate, and validate credentials without exposing sensitive values in conversation history. It supports secret scanning, environment diffing, and secure command execution by injecting masked variables directly into the runtime environment.
      8
      2 npm
      2
      MIT
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      Enables AI agents to securely manage API keys and secrets via the MCP protocol, with encrypted storage at rest and a simple CLI and Python SDK.
      1
      MIT
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      Local, encrypted credential vault for AI agents that enables secure multi-account management across services like Supabase, GitHub, Vercel, and Stripe, allowing seamless account switching without restarting the chat client.
      6 npm
      2
      MIT
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      A
      maintenance
      Local credential broker that enables AI agents to securely run CLI tools like SSH and MySQL without exposing passwords to the AI context, environment variables, or process listings.
      3
      MIT

    TDQS

    A4.2/5.0

    Scored across 5 tools

    Disambiguation4/5

    Each tool has a distinct role: listing entries, exploring fields, showing status, running diagnostics, and updating configs. passkey_status and passkey_doctor both touch on security posture, but descriptions clarify that one is a quick status check while the other is a detailed diagnostic. No two tools are truly interchangeable.

    Naming Consistency4/5

    All tools share the passkey_ prefix, making the set cohesive. However, the suffix pattern is mixed: passkey_list is verb-like, while passkey_fields, passkey_status, and passkey_doctor are noun-like, and passkey_wrap_server is verb_noun. The prefix provides enough consistency that the naming is still predictable.

    Tool Count5/5

    Five tools is a well-scoped set for the domain of passkey management for MCP servers. Each tool addresses a clear need without redundancy or bloat, and the count is solidly within the ideal 3-15 range.

    Completeness4/5

    The tool surface covers the key workflows: discovering entries, inspecting fields, assessing security status, diagnosing issues, and applying the wrapper. Missing operations like creating or deleting passkey entries are likely out of scope since passkey itself manages those. The only minor gap is the lack of an 'unwrap' or 'revert' operation, but the core purpose is well covered.

    Maintenance

    ActivityMaintained
    ResponsivenessNo issues