arelle-mcp
Related Servers
Alternatives to arelle-mcp
No user-submitted related servers found.
Related Servers
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityAmaintenanceEnables conversational analysis of XBRL filings in memory, exposing 18 tools for querying statements, concepts, footings, segments, exhibits, and full-text regex across a filing without any database or indexing.1,795 PyPI1MIT

hub-equity-mcpofficial
AlicenseNot gradedqualityDmaintenanceStandardizes XBRL financial data from US SEC and European ESEF filings for LLM agents, enabling querying normalized financial facts like revenue and total assets across issuers and taxonomies.Apache 2.0- AlicenseNot gradedqualityDmaintenanceEnables LLMs to download, parse, and analyze SEC EDGAR filings, including 10-K/Q reports, XBRL financial statements, and insider trading data. It provides structured access to institutional holdings, corporate events, and financial facts for comprehensive investment research.16MIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityBmaintenanceEnables searching SEC EDGAR for companies, retrieving recent filings (e.g., 10-K, 10-Q), and accessing structured XBRL financial facts.42 npmMIT
- AlicenseAqualityCmaintenanceEnables reading SEC EDGAR filings efficiently, including extracting individual 10-K sections, retrieving XBRL financial facts, and searching filings, so models can access specific information without processing entire documents.61MIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityDmaintenanceEnables LLMs to access SEC EDGAR data: search filings, extract sections, pull structured financials, and track insider transactions.19 npmMIT
TDQS
Scored across 46 tools
Several tools have overlapping purposes (e.g., multiple fact extraction tools like xbrl_extract_facts, xbrl_fact_details, xbrl_company_facts), and the distinction between them may not be immediately clear to an agent. However, each tool has a specific use case described, reducing ambiguity somewhat.
All tools start with 'xbrl_' and use snake_case, providing a consistent prefix. However, the naming pattern mixes verb-first (e.g., xbrl_load_filing) and noun-first (e.g., xbrl_anomaly_detection) approaches, leading to minor inconsistency.
With 46 tools, the server is on the high end of tool counts. While the XBRL domain is complex and justifies many tools, there is some redundancy (e.g., multiple export formats) that could be consolidated.
The tool set covers a wide range of XBRL operations: loading, browsing, extraction, validation, comparison, and EDGAR-specific features. Minor gaps exist, such as no direct tool for modifying metadata, but overall the surface is comprehensive for its domain.