Skip to main content
Glama

Related Servers

Alternatives to arelle-mcp

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      A
      maintenance
      Enables conversational analysis of XBRL filings in memory, exposing 18 tools for querying statements, concepts, footings, segments, exhibits, and full-text regex across a filing without any database or indexing.
      1,795 PyPI
      1
      MIT
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      Standardizes XBRL financial data from US SEC and European ESEF filings for LLM agents, enabling querying normalized financial facts like revenue and total assets across issuers and taxonomies.
      Apache 2.0
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      Enables LLMs to download, parse, and analyze SEC EDGAR filings, including 10-K/Q reports, XBRL financial statements, and insider trading data. It provides structured access to institutional holdings, corporate events, and financial facts for comprehensive investment research.
      16
      MIT
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Enables searching SEC EDGAR for companies, retrieving recent filings (e.g., 10-K, 10-Q), and accessing structured XBRL financial facts.
      42 npm
      MIT
    • A
      license
      A
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Enables reading SEC EDGAR filings efficiently, including extracting individual 10-K sections, retrieving XBRL financial facts, and searching filings, so models can access specific information without processing entire documents.
      6
      1
      MIT
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      Enables LLMs to access SEC EDGAR data: search filings, extract sections, pull structured financials, and track insider transactions.
      19 npm
      MIT

    TDQS

    B3.4/5.0

    Scored across 46 tools

    Disambiguation3/5

    Several tools have overlapping purposes (e.g., multiple fact extraction tools like xbrl_extract_facts, xbrl_fact_details, xbrl_company_facts), and the distinction between them may not be immediately clear to an agent. However, each tool has a specific use case described, reducing ambiguity somewhat.

    Naming Consistency4/5

    All tools start with 'xbrl_' and use snake_case, providing a consistent prefix. However, the naming pattern mixes verb-first (e.g., xbrl_load_filing) and noun-first (e.g., xbrl_anomaly_detection) approaches, leading to minor inconsistency.

    Tool Count3/5

    With 46 tools, the server is on the high end of tool counts. While the XBRL domain is complex and justifies many tools, there is some redundancy (e.g., multiple export formats) that could be consolidated.

    Completeness4/5

    The tool set covers a wide range of XBRL operations: loading, browsing, extraction, validation, comparison, and EDGAR-specific features. Minor gaps exist, such as no direct tool for modifying metadata, but overall the surface is comprehensive for its domain.

    Maintenance

    ActivitySlowing
    ResponsivenessNo issues