Skip to main content
Glama
TheHiddenPandaDev

Agro GPS

by TheHiddenPandaDev
OverviewSchemaSourceRelated ServersDiscussionsAdmin
TypeScript
Remote

Related Servers

Alternatives to Agro GPS

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • agribrain

      VasileiosTs
      A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      Enables AI assistants to access free, open agronomic data for field briefings, spray windows, water balance, pest pressure, and more, using only public data sources without API keys.
      1
      MIT

    • CropProphEU

      DasClown
      A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      EU Crop Intelligence MCP Server — Yield forecasts, weather analysis, and phenology models for 15 countries. AI agent-native, multi-source intelligence (NASA POWER, Eurostat, Open-Meteo).
      MIT

    • E-phy MCP Server

      neayi
      A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      Provides access to the French e-phy catalog for detailed information on pesticides, fertilizers, and other phytosanitary products. It enables users to search for products, retrieve authorized usage specifications, and check the approval status of active substances.
      MIT

    • agriculture-mcp-server

      AiAgentKarl
      A
      license
      A
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      MCP server for agriculture and farming data. 8 tools: soil conditions (temperature, moisture), crop weather forecasts, historical climate data (NASA POWER, since 1981), global agriculture statistics (World Bank, 20+ indicators), and food product database (Open Food Facts, 3M+ products). All APIs free, no keys required.
      8
      1
      MIT
    Deploy Server
    One endpoint for every MCP toolRayrun runs every MCP server behind one URL and holds the credentials. Each call is decided per client, tool, and argument, then recorded.ray.runAd

    TDQS

    A3.6/5.0

    Scored across 16 tools

    Disambiguation4/5

    Most tools have clearly distinct purposes: field notebook operations, product lookups, farm/group listing, compliance review, and several financial views. There is some overlap between group_overview, advisor_portfolio, and finance_dashboard in reporting metrics, but descriptions scope them differently enough for an agent to choose correctly.

    Naming Consistency4/5

    All names use consistent snake_case and are descriptive, which makes the set readable. The main deviation is that some tools use verb_noun (list_farms, record_entry) while others use noun_noun (finance_dashboard, budget_variance), but the pattern is still predictable.

    Tool Count4/5

    16 tools is slightly above the ideal 3-15 range, but the server covers multiple domains: field entries, compliance, groups/advisors, product registers, and finance. Each tool appears to earn its place, so the count is reasonable rather than excessive.

    Completeness4/5

    The surface covers core read and reporting workflows plus entry creation, audit history, compliance review, product lookups, and extensive financial views. Minor gaps exist, such as no update/delete for entries and no active-substance product search, but these appear intentional or workable around.

    Resources