Skip to main content
Glama
AWS Pricing MCP Server

AWS Pricing MCP Server

Related Servers

Alternatives to AWS Pricing MCP Server

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • F
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      A
      maintenance
      This MCP server enables users to analyze AWS cloud costs, audit for wasted resources, and monitor budgets across multiple profiles and regions. It provides secure, local access to AWS financial data using natural language, with credentials never leaving the machine.
      -
    • A
      license
      A
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      An MCP server for accessing real-time AWS pricing information and providing cost analysis capabilities, with no AWS credentials required.
      9
      Apache 2.0
    • A
      license
      B
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      An MCP server for unified cost tracking and analysis across AWS, OpenAI, and Anthropic. It enables users to query expenditures, compare costs across providers, and analyze usage trends through natural language.
      10
      MIT
    • F
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      A read-only MCP server for inspecting AWS resources, detecting misconfigurations, and estimating costs across EC2, S3, and IAM, enabling agents to safely query and analyze cloud infrastructure.
      -

    TDQS

    A4/5.0

    Scored across 5 tools

    Disambiguation5/5

    Each tool has a clearly distinct purpose: analyzing CDK vs Terraform projects, retrieving pricing data, retrieving Bedrock patterns, and generating cost reports. No two tools overlap in function.

    Naming Consistency5/5

    All tools follow a consistent verb_noun naming pattern: analyze_cdk_project, analyze_terraform_project, get_pricing, get_bedrock_patterns, generate_cost_report. The verbs are descriptive and parallel where appropriate.

    Tool Count5/5

    With 5 tools, the server is well-scoped for its purpose of AWS pricing and cost analysis. Each tool covers a distinct step in the workflow, and the count is within the ideal range.

    Completeness4/5

    Core workflow is covered: analyze IaC projects, get pricing, generate reports. However, the get_pricing description references a get_price_list_file tool for historical data that does not exist in this server, creating a minor gap. Service code discovery also relies on external commands rather than a built-in tool.

    Maintenance

    ActivityInactive
    ResponsivenessNo recent community issues