Skip to main content
Glama

Related Servers

Alternatives to Concordia MCP

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      Provides comprehensive analytics and insights for Solana wallets and their DeFi activities, including transaction tracking, DeFi position monitoring, risk profiling, and strategy recommendations.
      15 npm
      7
      MIT
    • F
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Provides read-only Solana wallet intelligence for evidence-first copy-trading research, enabling exact wallet activity, parsed swaps, transaction evidence, current positions, token snapshots, source-vs-copy comparisons, watchlist scans, and partial Odin-rule classification.
      -
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      AI-powered Solana DEX smart money signals. Detects whale/dolphin accumulation, divergence patterns, and market phase across 170+ tokens. Pay-per-call via x402 USDC micropayments.
      30 npm
      1
      MIT
    • A
      license
      B
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      Provides deep analysis of Solana tokens, their risks, and holder information.
      16
      22 npm
      MIT
    • F
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      Enables AI-powered DeFi operations across Ethereum, Polygon, and Solana with automated portfolio optimization, risk assessment, and yield farming strategies. Provides intelligent portfolio diagnostics, investment strategy generation, and multi-chain DeFi protocol integration through natural language.
      -

    TDQS

    C2.9/5.0

    Scored across 3 tools

    Disambiguation4/5

    The tools have distinct primary purposes: analyzeWallet focuses on DeFi profiling and recommendations, fetchWalletActivity retrieves transaction history, and getTransactionDetails provides specific transaction data. However, there is some overlap as analyzeWallet likely uses transaction data, but the descriptions clarify their different intents well.

    Naming Consistency3/5

    The naming is mixed: analyzeWallet and fetchWalletActivity use camelCase, while getTransactionDetails uses a different verb style and structure. This inconsistency makes the set less predictable, though the names remain readable and descriptive of their functions.

    Tool Count3/5

    With only 3 tools, the server feels thin for a DeFi/Solana wallet analysis domain. While the tools cover key operations, more comprehensive coverage (e.g., for token balances or portfolio tracking) might be expected, making the count borderline for the apparent scope.

    Completeness3/5

    The tools provide good coverage for wallet analysis and transaction details, but there are notable gaps. For example, there are no tools for fetching token balances, interacting with DeFi protocols, or updating wallet data, which could limit agent workflows in this domain.

    Maintenance

    ActivityInactive
    ResponsivenessNo issues