Skip to main content
Glama
The-Focus-AI

Buttondown MCP Server

by The-Focus-AI
OverviewSchemaSourceRelated ServersDiscussionsAdmin
TypeScript
Remote

Related Servers

Alternatives to Buttondown MCP Server

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • Buttondown MCP Server

      dgalarza
      A
      license
      A
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Enables interaction with the Buttondown newsletter API for managing emails, subscribers, and tags.
      15
      32 npm
      1
      MIT
    • Tratto MCP Server by tratto-email

      Tratto MCP Serverofficial

      tratto-email
      F
      license
      A
      quality
      F
      maintenance
      Lets AI tools send transactional emails, check status, and manage contacts through the Model Context Protocol.
      2
      -
    • @sendbyte/mcp by Sendbyte-Africa

      @sendbyte/mcpofficial

      Sendbyte-Africa
      A
      license
      A
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      Enables AI agents to send emails and manage sending domains, templates, analytics, and content checks through the SendByte platform using the Model Context Protocol.
      11
      13 npm
      MIT

    • MuntuAI MCP

      design-smith
      F
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      Enables AI agents to programmatically manage email outreach campaigns, leads, domains, senders, and webhook events, as well as send emails, through the Model Context Protocol over HTTP.
      -
    Deploy Server
    One endpoint for every MCP toolRayrun runs every MCP server behind one URL and holds the credentials. Each call is decided per client, tool, and argument, then recorded.ray.runAd

    TDQS

    A3.7/5.0

    Scored across 4 tools

    Disambiguation5/5

    Each tool has a clearly distinct purpose targeting specific actions in the email lifecycle: create_draft for creation, list_emails for listing, get_analytics for analytics retrieval, and schedule_draft for scheduling. There is no overlap or ambiguity between these functions.

    Naming Consistency5/5

    All tool names follow a consistent verb_noun pattern with snake_case (create_draft, get_analytics, list_emails, schedule_draft). The verbs are appropriate and predictable, making the set easy to understand and use.

    Tool Count4/5

    With 4 tools, the count is reasonable for an email newsletter server, covering core operations. However, it feels slightly thin as it lacks tools for updating or deleting drafts, which are common in such domains, but the scope is still well-defined.

    Completeness4/5

    The tool set covers key email lifecycle stages: creation, listing, analytics, and scheduling. Minor gaps exist, such as no update_draft or delete_draft tools, but agents can work around this by creating new drafts or using existing ones, and the core workflow is supported.

    Resources