Administrator: List_administrators

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

Annotations already declare readOnlyHint=true and openWorldHint=true, so the safety profile is covered. The description adds nothing beyond that: no note on pagination behavior, result scope (all accounts vs. tenant), or what the listing returns. For a zero-effort sentence this is a clear gap.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

It is a single front-loaded sentence with no filler, so nothing is wasted. However, at six words it is under-specified rather than genuinely concise for a tool with three parameters and several sibling alternatives.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

For a simple read-only list tool with 100% schema coverage and no output schema, the description is minimally sufficient. It still omits the scope of 'all' (which accounts/tenants) and any pagination expectation, which matters given the near-identical sibling listing tools.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema description coverage is 100%, with filter, offset and pageSize each fully documented in the schema (filter syntax, defaults, max 100). The description adds no parameter meaning of its own, so the baseline of 3 applies when the schema does all the work.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description states a verb and resource ('List ... administrators'), but it largely restates the tool name List_administrators, adding only 'all' and 'Brivo'. It does not distinguish this global listing from the sibling List_account_administrators or from Get_administrator, so an agent cannot tell the scopes apart without opening schemas.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

No when-to-use guidance is given. The description never explains when to call this instead of List_account_administrators (account-scoped) or Get_current_administrator, and there are no stated prerequisites or exclusions.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.