Skip to main content
Glama
TedyHub
by TedyHub

Related Servers

Alternatives to deeptap-mcp

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      MCP server that enables AI agents to manage Lnkify links, domains, API keys, and analytics. Allows creation and resolution of short links through natural language.
      MIT
    • A
      license
      A
      quality
      A
      maintenance
      An MCP server for in-loop design review of web previews. It enables agents to submit a preview URL, receive structured findings with suggested fixes, and recheck after applying changes, while never editing code itself.
      5
      1
      MIT
    • A
      license
      A
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      MCP server for managing deep links, analytics, and app configuration on Grovs. Works with Claude Code, Cursor, Windsurf, and any MCP-compatible client.
      16
      2
      MIT
    • F
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      A unified MCP server providing x402 payments, TAP identity verification, referral onboarding, and domain registration for Claude Code and other MCP clients.
      -
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      MCP server for domainagent.dev, enabling AI agents to search, register, deploy, host, and manage domains with USDC payment on Base via x402. Supports static site deployment via Cloudflare Pages and DNS management.
      5 npm
      MIT

    TDQS

    A4.4/5.0

    Scored across 6 tools

    Disambiguation5/5

    Each tool has a unique purpose: account info, domain verification, listing, retrieval, creation, and updating. No two tools overlap, and the distinction between list/get and create/update is clear.

    Naming Consistency5/5

    All tools follow a consistent verb_noun pattern in snake_case (get_account, verify_domain, list_domains, get_domain, create_domain, update_domain). This makes the API predictable and easy to navigate.

    Tool Count5/5

    With 6 tools, the server covers its domain management purpose without excess. Each tool is necessary and the count is typical for a focused CRUD-style API.

    Completeness4/5

    The domain lifecycle is mostly complete with list, get, create, and update, but a delete_domain operation is missing. The verify_domain tool adds value, yet the absence of delete is a minor gap for full resource management.

    Maintenance

    ActivityInactive
    ResponsivenessNo issues