apex_add_notification_region

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

Annotations declare readOnlyHint=false, destructiveHint=false, and idempotentHint=false, meaning the tool mutates state. The description merely says 'Add' and does not disclose side effects (e.g., whether it overwrites an existing region, whether it requires unique region_name, or any permission requirements). It adds no behavioral context beyond what annotations already provide.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

A single, front-loaded sentence with the verb first, followed by the resource and key options. Every word contributes to understanding. Extremely efficient and well-structured.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

For a tool with 8 parameters, the schematic coverage is rich, and an output schema exists. The description adequately conveys the core purpose without needing to explain parameters or return values. It is slightly thin on rationale versus siblings, but the schema fills the gaps.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema coverage is 100% with detailed descriptions for all 8 parameters. The description's mention of 'info/success/warning/error' and 'optional dismiss' merely echoes the schema's notification_type and dismissible descriptions. It adds no extra meaning beyond the schema.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states the action ('Add') and the specific resource ('inline notification/alert'), and enumerates the supported types (info/success/warning/error) and the optional dismiss feature. It differentiates this tool from generic region-adders like 'apex_add_region', though it doesn't explicitly distinguish it from the similarly-named 'apex_add_alert_box' sibling.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The description implies usage: when you want to add an inline notification/alert to a page. However, there is no explicit guidance on when to use this tool versus alternatives like 'apex_add_alert_box' or 'apex_add_region', nor any exclusions or prerequisites.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.