get_worklog
Retrieve worklogs for any Jira ticket to track time spent on tasks.
Instructions
Get worklogs for a specific Jira ticket
Input Schema
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| ticketId | Yes | The Jira ticket ID (e.g., PROJECT-123) |
Retrieve worklogs for any Jira ticket to track time spent on tasks.
Get worklogs for a specific Jira ticket
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| ticketId | Yes | The Jira ticket ID (e.g., PROJECT-123) |
Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?
No annotations are provided, and the description does not disclose behavioral traits like pagination, rate limits, or permission requirements. The description is minimal.
Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.
Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?
The description is a single concise sentence that is front-loaded and contains no wasted words.
Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.
Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?
While the tool is simple, the description lacks details on the return format or whether it returns all worklogs. Given no output schema and many sibling tools, it is marginally adequate.
Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.
Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?
The description does not add meaning beyond the input schema, which already documents the ticketId parameter. Since schema coverage is 100%, the baseline score of 3 is appropriate.
Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.
Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?
The description clearly states the action 'Get' and the resource 'worklogs for a specific Jira ticket'. It effectively distinguishes from sibling tools like add_worklog, update_worklog, and delete_worklog.
Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.
Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?
No guidance is provided on when to use this tool versus alternatives, such as search_tickets or get_comments. No exclusions or prerequisites are mentioned.
Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.
We provide all the information about MCP servers via our MCP API.
curl -X GET 'https://glama.ai/api/mcp/v1/servers/TarasKhust/jira-mcp-server'
If you have feedback or need assistance with the MCP directory API, please join our Discord server