memvid-mcp
Related Servers
Alternatives to memvid-mcp
No user-submitted related servers found.
Related Servers
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityDmaintenanceAn MCP server that provides memory management tools for AI agents, enabling adding, searching, updating, and deleting memories via the Mem0 API.9 npmMIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityAmaintenanceAn MCP server that extends AI agents' context window by providing tools to store, retrieve, and search memories, allowing agents to maintain history and context across long interactions.MIT
- AlicenseAqualityCmaintenanceMCP server providing persistent memory for AI agents, enabling them to read, write, and query memories across sessions.917 npmMIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityBmaintenanceA self-hosted MCP server that provides a personal semantic memory layer for AI tools. It enables storing, searching, and managing memories using hybrid vector and keyword search, allowing AI assistants to recall information by meaning.MIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityBmaintenanceA self-hosted memory server that gives AI agents a shared, persistent second brain, enabling verbatim storage, hybrid semantic/keyword retrieval, and a synthesized wiki layer through MCP tools.MIT
- AlicenseAqualityDmaintenanceAn MCP server that provides persistent memory capabilities for AI agents using Mem0, enabling storage, search, and management of contextual information across conversations with support for multiple backends and LLM providers.1821 PyPIMIT
TDQS
Scored across 40 tools
Most tools have distinct purposes, but there is some overlap that could cause confusion. For example, memvid_find and memvid_vec_search both handle search operations with different methods, and memvid_verify and memvid_verify_single_file are similar in function but differ in scope. The descriptions help clarify, but agents might misselect between closely related tools.
All tool names follow a consistent snake_case pattern with a 'memvid_' prefix, such as memvid_fetch, memvid_ask, and memvid_audit. This uniformity makes the tool set predictable and easy to navigate, with no deviations in naming conventions.
With 40 tools, the count is excessive for a memory management server, making it feel heavy and potentially overwhelming. A more focused set of 10-20 tools would be more appropriate for this domain, as many operations could be consolidated or simplified.
The tool set provides comprehensive coverage for memory file operations, including creation, reading, updating, deletion, search, enrichment, export, and management tasks like encryption and diagnostics. There are no obvious gaps, and it supports full CRUD/lifecycle workflows for the domain.