Skip to main content
Glama
TanvirIslam-BD

permission-aware-mcp

Related Servers

Alternatives to permission-aware-mcp

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • F
      license
      A
      quality
      A
      maintenance
      Enables coding agents to perform workspace-confined file operations, read-only Git inspection, and structured shell commands, while requiring out-of-band human approval for mutations and external executions and maintaining an audit trail.
      14
      3
      -
    • F
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Enables AI agents to safely read and write files in a sandboxed workspace via natural language, with on-demand connection, CVE-hardened path confinement, injection resistance, and full audit logging.
      -
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      A
      maintenance
      Enables AI tools to securely inspect remote servers by listing directories, reading configuration files, and performing authorized actions through permission controls, human-in-the-loop approvals, and audit logging. It acts as a bastion that never reveals raw SSH credentials or root passwords to the model.
      1
      MIT
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      A
      maintenance
      Enables human-approved SSH terminal sessions and confined SFTP file operations for SSH-configured devices, with user-controlled terminal and file explorer.
      AGPL 3.0
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      A
      maintenance
      Enables AI clients to securely inspect and edit approved code, use semantic code intelligence, run builds/tests, supervise bounded processes, inspect Git, and execute owner-approved SSH commands on engineering workstations.
      1
      Apache 2.0

    TDQS

    A4.2/5.0

    Scored across 5 tools

    Disambiguation5/5

    Each tool has a clearly distinct purpose: read, write, delete files; execute commands; and approve operations. No overlap or ambiguity between them.

    Naming Consistency5/5

    All tool names follow a consistent verb_noun pattern, e.g., read_file, delete_file, approve_operation. This makes the tool surface predictable and easy to navigate.

    Tool Count5/5

    With 5 tools, the server is well-scoped for its purpose of providing permission-aware file and command operations. Each tool earns its place without unnecessary complexity.

    Completeness4/5

    Core file operations (read, write, delete) and command execution are covered. Minor gaps include the lack of a list/directory tool and no way to view pending approvals, but the essential workflow is complete.

    Maintenance

    ActivityInactive
    ResponsivenessNo issues