get_oracle_reports

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

With no annotations, the description must disclose behavioral traits. It mentions that oracle reports trigger reward distribution, but this is about the data's effect, not the tool's behavior. It does not state that the tool is read-only, require any authentication, or specify data freshness. The only behavioral hint is that it returns 'completed' reports.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is two sentences with no superfluous words. It front-loads the main purpose and adds brief context about the data's significance. Could be slightly more concise by combining sentences, but it is efficient overall.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

For a simple tool (one parameter, no output schema), the description is adequate but not fully complete. It explains what data is returned but does not specify the output format, ordering, or pagination (if any). Additional details on expected response structure would improve completeness.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema coverage is 100% and the schema fully describes the 'limit' parameter (type, range, default). The description does not add extra semantic meaning beyond what the schema provides, so a baseline score of 3 is appropriate.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states the verb 'Get', the resource 'Lido oracle completed reports', and specifies the content ('beacon chain balance, validator count per epoch'). It is distinct from sibling tools like 'get_node_operators' or 'get_withdrawal_requests', which target different data.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

No explicit guidance on when to use this tool versus alternatives. The description does not mention scenarios where another tool would be more appropriate, nor does it provide exclusions or context for selecting this over siblings such as 'get_recent_submissions' or 'get_lido_stats'.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.