Skip to main content
Glama
TaehongKim

classScopusMCP

by TaehongKim

Related Servers

Alternatives to classScopusMCP

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • A
      license
      A
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Unified MCP server for scientific literature search and extraction, integrating databases like Scopus, OpenAlex, Semantic Scholar, and Unpaywall to enable AI agents to discover papers, track citations, and analyze content.
      27
      MIT
    • A
      license
      A
      quality
      A
      maintenance
      An MCP server for academic literature research that integrates Scopus, CrossRef, OpenAlex, and Unpaywall to search documents, get abstracts, author profiles, citing papers, and open-access PDF links.
      9
      MIT
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      A MCP server for academic literature retrieval, aggregating multiple data sources like arXiv, Crossref, OpenAlex, PubMed, and Semantic Scholar to provide search, details, citations, trends, and recommendations.
      4
      MIT
    • A
      license
      B
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      An MCP server for searching and downloading academic papers from multiple sources including arXiv, PubMed, bioRxiv, and Sci-Hub, designed for seamless integration with large language models like Claude Desktop.
      57
      2,161 PyPI
      2,611
      MIT

    TDQS

    A3.8/5.0

    Scored across 2 tools

    Disambiguation5/5

    The two tools are clearly distinct: one searches by keyword, the other retrieves a specific paper by DOI. There is no ambiguity in purpose, as each targets a different lookup method.

    Naming Consistency5/5

    Both tool names follow a consistent verb_noun pattern with snake_case: 'search_papers' and 'get_abstract_by_doi'. The naming is predictable and descriptive.

    Tool Count4/5

    While only two tools are provided, they are well-scoped for the stated purpose of searching papers and fetching abstracts by DOI. The count is slightly lean but not unreasonable for a focused utility.

    Completeness4/5

    The tool set covers the essential operations for finding papers and obtaining abstracts. Minor gaps exist, such as lack of citation data or full metadata retrieval, but the core workflow is complete.

    Maintenance

    ActivityInactive
    ResponsivenessNo issues