list_snapshot_files

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

With no annotations, the description carries full responsibility for disclosing behavior. It fails to mention whether listing is recursive or just immediate children, whether both files and directories are returned, any pagination or sorting behavior, or any permissions required. This leaves the agent guessing about the tool's actual behavior.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is a single, clear sentence that is efficiently written and front-loaded. It avoids unnecessary filler, though it may be too brief to convey essential context.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Given the tool has three parameters and no annotations, the description is far too sparse. It does not explain the browsing behavior, how the path parameter affects results, or any relevant caveats. The presence of an output schema reduces the need to document return values, but the description still fails to provide a complete picture.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

The schema covers all three parameters with descriptive text (e.g., path defaults to '/', repo_id is resolved to a GUID). The description adds no additional parameter information, so a baseline score of 3 is appropriate given 100% schema coverage.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description 'Browse files within a specific snapshot' uses a clear verb ('browse') and resource ('snapshot'), and the tool name reinforces this. It is distinguished from sibling tools like list_snapshots and get_summary, but it doesn't explicitly mention that browsing can target subdirectories via the 'path' parameter.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

No guidance is provided on when to use this tool versus alternatives, nor are there any exclusions or prerequisites. The description only states what the tool does, not when it should be called.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.