Skip to main content
Glama
TSS99

ReturnRadar MCP Server

by TSS99

Related Servers

Alternatives to ReturnRadar MCP Server

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Enables reading and changing personal finance data—accounts, transactions, categories, budgets, and reminders—and generating reports through 28 MCP tools over local stdio or authenticated remote HTTP.
      MIT
    • F
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      A database-first personal knowledge management system powered by a local MCP server, providing 29 tools to manage and search structured knowledge (meetings, emails, people, accounts, projects, todos, etc.) via a single SQLite file.
      -
    • F
      license
      A
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Provides MCP tools to query and manage a computer store's catalogue, stock, prices, promotions, installment plans, quotes, reservations, and orders, backed by PostgreSQL.
      14
      -
    • F
      license
      A
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Enables local, deterministic management and search of point-of-sale support data—branches, terminals, incidents, and incident history—with read-only queries and mutating tools over stdio using simulated SQLite data.
      11
      -
    • F
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Enables MCP-compatible clients to retrieve invoice and purchase order data live over stdio through tools for listing invoices, getting invoice details, and fetching purchase orders.
      -

    TDQS

    B3.4/5.0

    Scored across 8 tools

    Disambiguation4/5

    Most tools have clearly distinct purposes: create, list/search, detail, update fields, update status, generate draft, and warranty status. Two mild overlaps exist: update_purchase vs update_purchase_status both modify a purchase, and get_purchase_details vs get_upcoming_deadlines both surface deadlines, but descriptions clarify the boundaries.

    Naming Consistency5/5

    All tools use snake_case with a consistent verb_noun pattern (add_, get_, update_, generate_). The only slight variation is 'get_my_purchases' using a possessive, but it still follows the same convention.

    Tool Count5/5

    Eight tools fit the focused purchase-return tracking domain well. Each tool earns its place by covering a distinct operation without redundancy.

    Completeness4/5

    Core lifecycle is present: create, list/search, detail, update fields/status, deadline retrieval, return drafting, and warranty status. Minor gaps include no delete operation and no direct way to update or manage warranty terms, but agents can likely work around them.

    Maintenance

    ActivityMaintained
    ResponsivenessNo issues