Skip to main content
Glama
README.md
# Tanilo MCP server

An MCP server that connects Claude Desktop, Cursor, Windsurf or any other MCP client to the Tanilo API at `https://api.tanilo.io`.

Tanilo checks the premise before an AI agent acts. This server exposes one check, the contract price check, and two status documents. The routes it calls are live in free beta, rate-limited, no key needed. The server holds no secrets and makes no payments.

Tanilo was AgentOracle until September 2026. Versions up to 2.1.2 were published as `agentoracle-mcp`; that package is no longer maintained.

This README describes version 3.0.0. The outputs below were captured on 2026-10-08 by running the tools against the live API.

---

## Install

```bash
npx tanilo-mcp
```

### Claude Desktop

Open your Claude Desktop config file:

**Mac:** `~/Library/Application Support/Claude/claude_desktop_config.json`
**Windows:** `%APPDATA%\Claude\claude_desktop_config.json`

Add this and restart Claude Desktop:

```json
{
  "mcpServers": {
    "tanilo": {
      "command": "npx",
      "args": ["-y", "tanilo-mcp"]
    }
  }
}
```

Cursor (Settings → MCP → Add Server) and Windsurf (Settings → MCP Servers → Add) take the same `tanilo` block.

---

## Tools

### `check-contract-price`

Does this offer match the terms you supplied? Before an agent accepts an offer, `contract_price_match` compares the offer's unit price with the applicable term among the terms you supply, and signs the result when signing succeeds.

No model is involved: the result is arithmetic and exact comparison, and anyone holding the same input can recompute it. You supply the terms; Tanilo does not hold or look up your contracts. Three results: verified, contradicted, or indeterminate with a reason. A verified result says the price matches the supplied term. Whether to pay is your policy's decision.

Input: `offer` (`unit_price`, `currency`, `unit`, and optionally `quantity`, `seller`, `sku`, `offered_at`) and `terms` (a list; each has `agreement_id`, `version`, `currency`, `unit`, and either `price_per_unit` or `tiers`, plus optional `seller`, `product_scope`, `effective_from`, `effective_to`, `supersedes`). Prices and quantities are decimal strings such as `"2.00"`. The full input rules, tiers and amendments are at https://tanilo.io/docs/contract-price-check.

The tool returns the check result and the signed receipt. Captured live on 2026-10-08 for the docs example (an offer of USD 2.00 per call against a supplied term of USD 1.00 per call), trimmed:

```json
{
  "verdict": "halt",
  "state": "contradicted",
  "outcome": "fail",
  "reason": "price_mismatch",
  "recommendation": "offer price differs from the applicable term among the supplied terms",
  "evidence": {
    "rule_id": "contract-price-match/v0.1",
    "terms_source": "caller_supplied",
    "expected": { "price_per_unit": "1.00", "currency": "USD", "unit": "call" },
    "offered": { "unit_price": "2.00", "currency": "USD", "unit": "call", "quantity": "1" },
    "difference_per_unit": "1.00",
    "offer_is": "above_term_price"
  },
  "check_mode": "deterministic",
  "canonical_sha256": "sha256-…",
  "kid": "tanilo-2026-10-ed25519-7d885da9",
  "jwks_url": "https://tanilo.io/.well-known/jwks.json",
  "receipt": { "payload": "…", "signatures": [ … ] }
}
```

With `"terms": []` the same offer gives `state` `indeterminate`, `reason` `no_applicable_term`, `verdict` `halt`.

A valid signature shows which key signed these bytes and that they have not changed since. It does not show that the supplied terms were genuine. Check the signature offline with [`tanilo-receipt-verify`](https://github.com/TKCollective/tanilo-receipt-verify) against the key set at `https://tanilo.io/.well-known/jwks.json`:

```bash
pip install tanilo-receipt-verify
python3 -c "import json; from tanilo_receipt_verify import verify; r = verify(json.load(open('receipt.json')), jwks_by_issuer={'https://tanilo.io/.well-known/jwks.json': json.load(open('jwks.json'))}); print(r.status, r.canonical_sha256)"
```

where `receipt.json` holds the tool's `receipt` object and `jwks.json` the key set.

### `check-health`

Returns the API's status document (`GET /health`): service status, the live routes and their prices, the retired routes, and rate limits.

### `get-manifest`

Returns the API's discovery document (`GET /.well-known/x402-manifest.json`). It lists no payable resources: the paid research routes were retired on 2026-10-04.

---

## What this server does not do

- It has no tool for Tanilo's claim check (`POST /evaluate`) yet. The route is free during the beta and can be called directly; see https://tanilo.io/pricing.
- It does not pay for anything, hold a wallet, or read any key. The x402 payment code of earlier versions is gone.
- It does not verify signatures itself; use `tanilo-receipt-verify` as above.

## Development

```bash
npm install
npm run build
npm test          # starts the built server over stdio and calls the live API (free beta route)
```

Set `TANILO_PYTHON` to a Python that has `tanilo-receipt-verify` installed and the test also verifies the returned receipt's signature offline. Set `TANILO_API_BASE` to point the server at another host (tests only).

---

## Links

- [tanilo.io](https://tanilo.io) — site and documentation
- [tanilo.io/docs/contract-price-check](https://tanilo.io/docs/contract-price-check) — the check this server exposes
- [tanilo.io/trust](https://tanilo.io/trust) — keys, and what a signature does and does not establish
- [tanilo-receipt-spec](https://github.com/TKCollective/tanilo-receipt-spec) — the receipt format
- [tanilo-receipt-verify](https://github.com/TKCollective/tanilo-receipt-verify) — offline signature check

Contact: joe@tanilo.io

MIT licensed. TK Collective LLC.

TDQS

A4.2/5.0

Scored across 4 tools

Disambiguation5/5

Each tool has a clearly distinct purpose: check-health verifies API status, deep-research provides comprehensive analysis, get-manifest retrieves payment details, and research offers basic real-time research. There is no overlap in functionality, and the descriptions clearly differentiate their scopes and use cases.

Naming Consistency5/5

All tool names follow a consistent kebab-case pattern with clear verb-noun combinations: check-health, deep-research, get-manifest, and research. The naming is predictable and readable, with no deviations in style or convention.

Tool Count5/5

With 4 tools, the set is well-scoped for the AgentOracle MCP server's purpose, covering API health checks, payment integration, and two tiers of research functionality. Each tool earns its place without redundancy, making the count appropriate for the domain.

Completeness4/5

The tool surface covers core functionalities: API status, payment details, and research operations with basic and deep tiers. A minor gap exists in lacking explicit CRUD operations for managing research queries or payment settings, but agents can work around this given the server's focus on querying and integration.

Maintenance

ActivityMaintained
ResponsivenessUnresponsive