Skip to main content
Glama
TIMBOTGPT

Screen Vision MCP Server

by TIMBOTGPT
OverviewSchemaSourceRelated ServersDiscussionsAdmin
JavaScript
Local

Related Servers

Alternatives to Screen Vision MCP Server

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • blade-computer-use

      echoVic
      A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Enables MCP clients to control macOS via accessibility and screen recording, providing tools to list apps, observe UI, click, type, press keys, and scroll.
      MIT

    • macos-computer-use

      johnexzy
      A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      A
      maintenance
      An ultra-fast native MCP server for macOS desktop automation, enabling visual OCR, text-based clicking, window management, and keyboard/mouse control without hijacking the physical cursor.
      37 npm
      1
      MIT

    • cua-local

      uxnew
      A
      license
      B
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Provides a local MCP bridge for AI assistants to control a Mac by observing screen state and performing actions like mouse movement, clicking, typing, and opening URLs.
      12
      MIT
    Deploy Server
    One endpoint for every MCP toolRayrun runs every MCP server behind one URL and holds the credentials. Each call is decided per client, tool, and argument, then recorded.ray.runAd

    TDQS

    A3.6/5.0

    Scored across 9 tools

    Disambiguation5/5

    Each tool targets a clearly distinct action: capturing a specific target, extracting/finding text, retrieving system info, clicking, or monitoring. Even the capture variants are disambiguated by their target (fullscreen, window, region).

    Naming Consistency5/5

    All tool names follow a consistent snake_case verb_noun pattern, such as capture_window, get_screen_info, and find_text_on_screen. This makes the tool set predictable and easy to navigate.

    Tool Count5/5

    Nine tools is well-scoped for a screen vision and automation server. Each tool covers a meaningful capability without unnecessary overlap or bloat.

    Completeness4/5

    The tool surface covers capture, OCR, text location, screen/window information, clicking, and region monitoring. Minor gaps exist around input actions like typing or scrolling, but core workflows are well supported.

    Maintenance

    ActivityInactive
    ResponsivenessNo issues

    Resources