A
licenseA
qualityC
maintenanceEnables real-time retrieval of authoritative Chinese government policies and verification of law article citations (《法名》第X条) via public sources, with no API key required.
6
MIT
china-law-mcp
by THUboran
Related Servers
Alternatives to china-law-mcp
No user-submitted related servers found.
Related Servers
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityCmaintenanceEnables AI agents to search mainland China's national laws, administrative and local regulations, judicial interpretations, and Supreme People's Court guiding cases, and to retrieve metadata plus the original Chinese text of individual articles or full regulations and case narratives. Results carry issuing body, promulgation and effective dates, and in-force status, with keyless access and no fabricated snippets when a document can't be read.472 npmMIT
- AlicenseAqualityCmaintenanceEnables AI clients to search roughly 4,600 Chinese legal-practice articles and guides by licensed lawyers, pinpoint and read individual provisions among 17,000+ statutes, and look up criminal charge elements, sentencing ranges, provincial compensation standards, courts, procuratorates, detention centers and other judicial resources, plus run 56 legal calculators. Responses return summaries and source links rather than full article text.11MIT
- AlicenseAqualityCmaintenanceProvides offline access to the French legal corpus (Legifrance/DILA) with full-text search, verbatim article retrieval, and citation grounding to prevent hallucinations.40MIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityBmaintenanceEnables AI agents to check Chinese commercial content for advertising-law prohibited terms, AI-generated-content labeling requirements, and 17-item organizational compliance self-assessment, returning each hit with its location, cited legal basis, and revision suggestion. Runs fully offline with a deterministic rule engine and zero external dependencies.MIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityAmaintenanceSemantic and exact retrieval over 22M Taiwan court judgments with built-in citation guardrails — bundles carry a read-whitelist so downstream models cannot cite judgments whose reasoning was never read. Also provides exact lookup of administrative interpretations with lifecycle status (repealed / superseded / unverified).61 PyPI341Elastic 2.0
TDQS
A3.9/5.0
Scored across 5 tools
Disambiguation4/5
search_statutes (NL retrieval) and get_article (exact law+article lookup) overlap somewhat, especially since search_statutes also does '直查优先' for exact citations. verify_citation also retrieves a law+article, but its validation-focused return (verified bool) distinguishes it from get_article's text retrieval, and check_citations_in_text is clearly distinct as a batch extractor.
Naming Consistency5/5
All five tools use a consistent snake_case verb_noun pattern: search_statutes, get_article, list_laws, verify_citation, check_citations_in_text. The longer batch tool name remains readable and follows the same convention.
Tool Count5/5
Five tools is well-scoped for a legal retrieval/verification server, with each tool covering a distinct capability (search, exact fetch, browse, single verify, bulk verify). No redundant or filler tools.
Completeness4/5
The surface covers the core read-only legal workflow: search by NL, fetch by citation, browse the catalog, and verify single or bulk citations. Minor gaps like retrieving a full law's chapter structure or browsing by effective date exist, but the primary agent workflows are supported.
Maintenance
ActivityMaintained
ResponsivenessNo issues