Skip to main content
Glama
TELOS-Labs-AI

telos-mcp

Official
by TELOS-Labs-AI
OverviewSchemaSourceRelated ServersDiscussionsAdmin
Python
Local

Related Servers

Alternatives to telos-mcp

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • Project Telos

      HarperZ9
      A
      license
      A
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Local-first MCP tools for AI-assisted work receipts, workspace maps, routing ledgers, measured verdicts, and shared state verification across the five Project Telos flagships.
      50
      40 npm
      4
      Functional Source , Version 1.1, ALv2 Future

    • Sovereign Copilot MCP Server

      glatinone
      A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Enables users to expose temporal architectural memory, privacy sanitization, and local test-runner capabilities as MCP tools so clients like Claude Desktop, Cursor, and Hermes Agent can query decisions, sanitize prompts, and verify code changes.
      MIT

    • WhitePact

      Guruprasath-Annadurai
      A
      license
      A
      quality
      A
      maintenance
      An MCP server that exposes governance, trust-scoring, compliance, guardrail, cost, drift, and supply-chain scanning tools and resources to any MCP client over stdio, Streamable HTTP, or legacy HTTP+SSE. It lets agents route every tool call through a deterministic five-way decision (allow, redact, require approval, deny, or quarantine) with hash-chained evidence, human approval workflows, and in-agent trust gates for LangChain, LangGraph, and Google ADK.
      30
      76 PyPI
      2
      MIT
    Deploy Server
    One endpoint for every MCP toolRayrun runs every MCP server behind one URL and holds the credentials. Each call is decided per client, tool, and argument, then recorded.ray.runAd

    TDQS

    A4.2/5.0

    Scored across 5 tools

    Disambiguation5/5

    Each tool targets a distinct operation: scoring, verification, fetching purpose anchors, auditing, and replay. There is no overlap, and the descriptions clearly differentiate their purposes.

    Naming Consistency5/5

    All tool names follow the 'telos_<verb>' pattern (e.g., telos_score, telos_verify, telos_get_pa, telos_audit, telos_replay). The naming is uniform and predictable, with no mixing of styles.

    Tool Count5/5

    With 5 tools, the server is well-scoped for its governance/audit domain. Each tool serves a necessary function, and the count is neither too few nor too many.

    Completeness4/5

    The tool set covers the core workflows: scoring, verification, fetching governance config, auditing, and replay. A potential gap is the absence of a tool to create or update Purpose Anchors, but the set appears complete for the stated monitoring/analysis purpose.

    Maintenance

    ActivityMaintained
    ResponsivenessNo issues

    Resources