Skip to main content
Glama
TCHINDAJOEL

Filigree

by TCHINDAJOEL
OverviewSchemaSourceRelated ServersDiscussionsAdmin
Python
Local

Related Servers

Alternatives to Filigree

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • Runar

      muhammadluth
      A
      license
      B
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Provides AI agents with durable, searchable project memory, session notes, skills, and bounded context packs over MCP while leaving orchestration to the client.
      15
      MIT

    • MCP Shared Memory Hub

      shirisha456
      A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Enables multiple MCP-compatible AI clients to share persistent, versioned project knowledge across sessions with conflict-safe updates, provenance, hybrid retrieval, stale-memory handling, and context-budgeted recall.
      MIT

    • workspace-mcp

      MarcoCaamal
      A
      license
      A
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Enables MCP clients to safely read, write, edit, search, and optionally run commands within one or more named project workspaces, while maintaining a work journal and tracking changes.
      19
      MIT

    • enterprise-knowledge-mcp

      xuenyuxey
      A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Provides enterprise knowledge management capabilities via MCP, enabling semantic search across the knowledge base, retrieval of full documents by ID, and search over enterprise project cases.
      MIT
    Deploy Server
    Context All Your Agents Can ShareAgents share what they learn, hand off work, and hold it when you switch models. Start with 5 GB free.fulcradynamics.comAd

    TDQS

    B3.2/5.0

    Scored across 5 tools

    Disambiguation4/5

    Each tool has a fairly distinct role: listing projects, folder-to-project lookup, lexical search, context handoff, and a write proposal. The main overlap risk is search_memory vs get_handoff, since both return project knowledge, but the descriptions differentiate query-driven search from bounded current context well enough.

    Naming Consistency4/5

    Four of five tools follow a clean verb_noun pattern (list_projects, search_memory, get_handoff, propose_memory). project_for_folder deviates into a noun_for_noun lookup style, which is a minor but readable inconsistency.

    Tool Count5/5

    Five tools is well-scoped for a project-memory server: two discovery tools, two retrieval tools, and one write path. Each tool earns its place with no filler.

    Completeness4/5

    The surface covers project discovery, memory search, context retrieval, and proposal submission, and explicitly documents what is out of scope (approval/publishing). Minor gaps remain: no tool to fetch a single memory entry by ID or to update/retract a proposal.

    Maintenance

    ActivityMaintained
    ResponsivenessNo issues

    Resources