Skip to main content
Glama
TAO-MINGYU

Codex to OpenCode MCP Server

by TAO-MINGYU

Related Servers

Alternatives to Codex to OpenCode MCP Server

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • A
      license
      B
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Enables MCP clients such as Claude Code, Codex CLI, and Cursor-agent to delegate bounded coding tasks to a local OpenCode v2.x installation via a single opencode_execute tool, returning the model's response, git diff/status summary, exit code, and session ID.
      1
      289 npm
      MIT
    • A
      license
      A
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Enables MCP-compatible coding agents to execute the local Codex CLI as a coding agent, including code reviews, session resume/fork, and CLI diagnostics.
      9
      10 npm
      MIT
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      A
      maintenance
      Lets Codex delegate coding and repository work to an installed Claude Code CLI with permission-aware inspect/write access, model and effort selection, resumable and cloud-attached sessions, and durable synchronous or asynchronous jobs.
      MIT
    • A
      license
      A
      quality
      A
      maintenance
      Enables Claude Code to delegate coding tasks—investigation, review, long-running background jobs, and optional file edits—to a locally installed OpenAI Codex CLI, with the model and reasoning effort chosen per task and read-only execution by default. Follow-up requests reuse Codex's existing context, and write-enabled delegations can be confined to a managed git worktree so the user's own checkout stays untouched.
      8
      211 npm
      MIT
    • A
      license
      A
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Enables delegation of coding tasks to a locally installed MiniMax Code CLI, leveraging user's existing login, models, and configuration.
      7
      685 npm
      MIT

    TDQS

    A4/5.0

    Scored across 2 tools

    Disambiguation4/5

    The two tools have clearly distinct roles: opencode_execute delegates a coding task, while opencode_check resolves the executable and reports its version. There is no realistic confusion between performing an action and checking the installation.

    Naming Consistency5/5

    Both tools use the same opencode_ prefix followed by a concise imperative verb, maintaining a consistent snake_case pattern. Though the prefix is a product name, the convention is uniform and predictable.

    Tool Count3/5

    Two tools is at the low end of typical server scope and feels thin for a coding integration. However, the narrow focus on delegating a single task plus a health check is reasonable enough to be borderline appropriate.

    Completeness4/5

    The server covers its core purpose: opencode_execute handles task delegation, and opencode_check verifies the underlying executable. Obvious lifecycle tools such as cancellation or querying current task status are absent, but they fall outside the stated minimal purpose.

    Maintenance

    ActivitySlowing
    ResponsivenessNo issues