Skip to main content
Glama
SweetKenneth

security-genome-reactor

by SweetKenneth

Related Servers

Alternatives to security-genome-reactor

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • A
      license
      A
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Enables agents and security automation to adjudicate proposed defense mutations against a sealed, canonicalized attack scenario, enforcing reproduction, impact-screening, regression, and proven-improvement gates before promoting at most one candidate. Every verdict, rejected candidate, and rejection reason is sealed into a recomputable SHA-256 Merkle evidence root and hash-linked lineage that can be independently verified without trusting the server.
      6
      MIT
    • A
      license
      B
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Enables generating falsifiable fleet hypotheses, compiling them into minimal bounded probe plans with control cohorts, and evaluating observations to return supported, refuted, or inconclusive verdicts.
      3
      MIT
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      A
      maintenance
      Enables coding agents to turn OpenSpec intents and Git changes into revision-bound proofs by planning, selecting, and running the smallest safe protection set, then verifying composite verdicts and explaining evidence or unresolved states.
      MIT
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Enables AI agents to self-govern by scanning code for hardcoded secrets, structural violations, and AI drift in real-time, providing fix packets for automatic remediation.
      27
      MIT
    • A
      license
      C
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Enforces design systems and vocabulary via ontology checks, candidate scanning, linting, and structural search across repositories.
      7
      39
      Apache 2.0
    • A
      license
      B
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Enables analysis of normalized scan findings as immune signals to discover co-occurring fleet threat patterns, synthesize non-executing defensive recipes, recall successful outcomes, and plan adjacent-cohort targeting via MCP tools.
      6
      MIT

    TDQS

    B3.2/5.0

    Scored across 5 tools

    Disambiguation5/5

    Each tool targets a clearly distinct step in the genome workflow: inferring phenotypes, seeding candidates, evolving generations, planning trials, and tracing lineage. There is no meaningful functional overlap between any two tools.

    Naming Consistency3/5

    All names share the genome_ prefix and use snake_case, which is readable and recognizable. However, the pattern is mixed: genome_infer_phenotypes is verb-object, genome_seed and genome_evolve are bare verbs, while genome_trial_plan and genome_lineage are noun phrases.

    Tool Count5/5

    Five tools is well-scoped for this specialized domain. Each tool represents a meaningful stage in the reactor lifecycle without redundant or filler operations.

    Completeness5/5

    The set covers the core genome lifecycle: infer phenotypes, seed candidates, evolve generations, produce trial plans, and inspect lineage. Fitness is intentionally caller-supplied, so no evaluation tool is a necessary gap.

    Maintenance

    ActivityMaintained
    ResponsivenessNo issues