Skip to main content
Glama
SweetKenneth

shpbl-scan-coverage-autopilot

by SweetKenneth
OverviewSchemaSourceRelated ServersDiscussionsAdmin
TypeScript
Remote

Related Servers

Alternatives to shpbl-scan-coverage-autopilot

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • Cryptotremor

      aniruddhaadak80
      A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Enables agents to inventory cryptographic primitives and score their quantum break cost, rupture year, and harvest-now-decrypt-later exposure against modelled attacker roadmaps and compliance deadlines. Exposes read and idempotent mutation tools for saving assets, sequencing migration waves, freezing verifiable partner reports, and replaying a SHA-384 audit chain to confirm integrity.
      MIT

    • pqc-triage

      aniruddhaadak80
      A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Enables an agent to import real dependency manifests and source excerpts, resolve each cryptographic surface to an algorithm, and assess it against published quantum resource estimates and NIST transition dates. Supports recording migration decisions with shelf-life inputs, replaying the SHA-384 seal chain, and exporting a cited migration plan with a start-by year for every surface.
      MIT

    • pentest-mcp-server

      Dr-yato
      A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      Enables authorized penetration testing and security assessments with CVE monitoring, vulnerability scanning, and reporting features.
      MIT

    • security-genome-reactor

      SweetKenneth
      A
      license
      B
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Enables evolving scan and policy configurations by inferring security phenotypes from observed findings, seeding competing genomes, measuring fitness, and generating bounded trial plans with ancestry lineage.
      5
      MIT
    Deploy Server
    One endpoint for every MCP toolRayrun runs every MCP server behind one URL and holds the credentials. Each call is decided per client, tool, and argument, then recorded.ray.runAd

    TDQS

    B3.1/5.0

    Scored across 3 tools

    Disambiguation5/5

    Each tool maps to a distinct stage of the scan-coverage workflow: analyzing blind spots, generating a plan, and comparing sealed plans. There is no meaningful overlap that would cause an agent to pick the wrong tool.

    Naming Consistency4/5

    All tools share a clear scan_ prefix and use snake_case action-oriented names. scan_plan is slightly less explicit than the verb_noun pattern of the others, but the convention is still easy to predict.

    Tool Count5/5

    Three tools is at the lower end of the ideal range but is well-scoped for the server's narrow autopilot purpose. Each tool earns its place and no tool feels redundant.

    Completeness4/5

    The set covers the core cycle of analyzing, generating, and comparing scan plans. There are minor gaps, such as no explicit plan listing or management operation, but the primary workflow is supported without dead ends.

    Maintenance

    ActivityMaintained
    ResponsivenessNo issues

    Resources