Skip to main content
Glama
SweetKenneth

nightmare-probe-engine

by SweetKenneth

Related Servers

Alternatives to nightmare-probe-engine

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Enables quant research organizations to log hypotheses and outcomes, count trials for honest statistical verdicts, explore novel methods, run significance gates, and evolve reusable skills from validated trajectories, all backed by SQLite.
      MIT
    • F
      license
      A
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Enables AI harnesses to run reasoning preflight and contradiction measurement, exposing tools for perspective selection, claim-pair contradiction scoring, and synthesis contract generation to improve final answers.
      4
      -
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      A
      maintenance
      Enables coding agents to turn OpenSpec intents and Git changes into revision-bound proofs by planning, selecting, and running the smallest safe protection set, then verifying composite verdicts and explaining evidence or unresolved states.
      MIT
    • F
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Enables AI agents and MCP clients to run deterministic deep research consensus arbitration by parsing queries, evaluating source authority and contradictions, and returning structured JSON dossiers and telemetry.
      7
      -
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Provides 8 MCP tools for deterministic, read-only reasoning: intake, routing, planning, rubric, sweep checklist, verdict gate, reflection, and evaluation. It forces scope locks, disconfirmation-first plans, blind-spot sweeps, and evidence-gated verdicts.
      Apache 2.0

    TDQS

    B3.1/5.0

    Scored across 3 tools

    Disambiguation5/5

    Each tool handles a distinct lifecycle stage: generating hypotheses, compiling them into probes, and evaluating results. There is no functional overlap or ambiguity between the three tools.

    Naming Consistency4/5

    All tools share the nightmare_ prefix and use verb_noun style. nightmare_generate lacks an explicit object compared to nightmare_compile_probe and nightmare_evaluate_probe, but the intent is still clear.

    Tool Count5/5

    Three tools map directly to a focused generate-compile-evaluate workflow. The count feels intentional and well-scoped for a single-purpose security probe engine.

    Completeness4/5

    The tool set covers the full hypothesis-to-verdict pipeline without obvious dead ends. It may rely on external systems for actual probe execution, but within its stated domain it appears complete.

    Maintenance

    ActivityMaintained
    ResponsivenessNo issues