Skip to main content
Glama
SweetKenneth

shpbl-counterfactual-exposure-planner

by SweetKenneth
OverviewSchemaSourceRelated ServersDiscussionsAdmin
TypeScript
Local

Related Servers

Alternatives to shpbl-counterfactual-exposure-planner

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • Counterfactual Immune Forge

      SweetKenneth
      A
      license
      A
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Enables agents and security automation to adjudicate proposed defense mutations against a sealed, canonicalized attack scenario, enforcing reproduction, impact-screening, regression, and proven-improvement gates before promoting at most one candidate. Every verdict, rejected candidate, and rejection reason is sealed into a recomputable SHA-256 Merkle evidence root and hash-linked lineage that can be independently verified without trusting the server.
      6
      MIT

    • PentestThinkingMCP

      ibrahimsaleem
      A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      Enables automated penetration testing workflow planning using Beam Search and Monte Carlo Tree Search algorithms to generate step-by-step attack paths, score vulnerabilities, and recommend tools for reconnaissance, exploitation, and privilege escalation tasks.
      38
      MIT

    • CyberSim Pro MCP Server

      kayembahamid
      F
      license
      B
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      Enables cybersecurity training, purple-team collaboration, and executive readiness through tools for scenario generation, attack simulation, telemetry analysis, incident investigation, forensics, and reporting with an immutable audit trail.
      12
      -

    • remediation-flight-recorder

      SweetKenneth
      A
      license
      A
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Enables security remediation as one auditable transaction: freezing pre-change exposure, computing blast radius, gating on policy and approval, binding execution receipts, verifying post-state, and rolling back on failure, all sealed in a SHA-256 evidence chain.
      6
      MIT
    Deploy Server
    One endpoint for every MCP toolRayrun runs every MCP server behind one URL and holds the credentials. Each call is decided per client, tool, and argument, then recorded.ray.runAd

    TDQS

    B3.2/5.0

    Scored across 3 tools

    Disambiguation5/5

    Each tool has a clearly distinct role: baseline measurement, single-scenario simulation, and multi-scenario ranking. There is no real overlap or ambiguity between these three operations.

    Naming Consistency4/5

    All tools share the exposure_ prefix and snake_case, which makes them predictable. The minor deviation is that exposure_baseline uses a noun while exposure_simulate and exposure_rank use verbs, slightly breaking a pure verb_noun pattern.

    Tool Count5/5

    Three tools is on the lower end but appropriate for a tightly scoped counterfactual exposure planner. Each tool covers a distinct stage in the workflow and none feels redundant.

    Completeness4/5

    The core planning workflow of baseline, simulate, and rank is well covered. The main gap is the lack of tools for defining/persisting scenarios or applying a chosen intervention, but this is not a fatal omission for a planner.

    Maintenance

    ActivityMaintained
    ResponsivenessNo issues

    Resources