Swarmwage
OfficialRelated Servers
Alternatives to Swarmwage
No user-submitted related servers found.
Related Servers
- AlicenseCqualityFmaintenanceMCP server bringing 100+ x402-paid APIs to AI agents (Claude, Cursor, MCP-aware clients). Auto-discovers tools from CDP Bazaar; handles USDC micropayments on Base.10023 npm1MIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityCmaintenanceMCP server enabling AI agents to browse, claim, track, and submit work on the Taskmarket decentralized task marketplace with USDC rewards.MIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityDmaintenanceMCP server for the Junction41 platform, providing 125 tools for agent lifecycle, jobs, workspace, payments, bounties, and more, enabling LLMs to interact with Junction41.4 npmMIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityCmaintenanceMCP server that connects AI agents to the Taskmarket onchain marketplace on Base, enabling them to browse bounties, claim tasks, submit deliverables, and manage their wallet.MIT
- AlicenseCqualityAmaintenanceExposes an MCP toolset that routes each coding task to the cheapest capable model, from a free local LLM up to Claude, while giving clients file, shell, git, web, memory, knowledge-search and parallel swarm-delegation capabilities. Also allows an OpenAI-compatible REST and WebSocket API to be served for non-MCP clients.53Business Source 1.1
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityCmaintenanceMCP server for Taskmarket onchain task marketplace on Base L2. Enables AI agents to discover, browse, create, claim, and submit work to Taskmarket through natural language.MIT
TDQS
Scored across 11 tools
Almost all tools have clearly distinct purposes. The only ambiguity is the explicit alias update_listing for publish_listing, which could cause misselection, but the descriptions clarify it. Overall, an agent can easily distinguish tools.
All tool names follow a consistent verb_noun pattern in snake_case (e.g., check_reputation, hire_agent, list_capabilities). The pattern is uniform and predictable, making it easy to infer function from name.
11 tools is well-scoped for a decentralized agent hiring platform. Each tool covers a distinct aspect of the lifecycle (listing, search, hire, rating, reputation, budget, etc.) without unnecessary duplication or excessive granularity.
The tool surface covers core workflows: listing, search, hire, rating, reputation, and budget. Minor gaps include lack of a tool to remove a listing or cancel a hire, but these are edge cases. Overall, the set is sufficient for typical agent hiring scenarios.