Skip to main content
Glama
Swanand33

mcp-llm-behave

by Swanand33

Related Servers

Alternatives to mcp-llm-behave

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Enables natural-language testing of MCP servers—covering tools, resources, prompts, contracts, and transports—without writing test code, with deterministic validation and CI integration.
      117 npm
      Apache 2.0
    • A
      license
      A
      quality
      A
      maintenance
      Enables MCP clients to score retrieval quality with recall, precision, nDCG, hit rate and MRR, compare 2-3 configurations with seeded paired-bootstrap confidence intervals, audit agent tool calls against expected traces, and detect prompt regressions against golden sets. It also generates Markdown, JSON or JUnit reports with pass/fail gates, all deterministically and offline without paid API keys.
      6
      308 npm
      1
      MIT
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Provides MCP tools for semantic search over personal knowledge sources using pluggable embeddings and local vector indexing.
      1
      MIT
    • F
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Provides MCP tools that give LLM agents a full QA engineer workflow: scanning projects, generating deterministic test suites, executing them across browser/API/mobile, diagnosing failures, and proposing fixes that require human approval.
      -
    • A
      license
      A
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      MCP server exposing statistical regression testing for LLM agents as a "run" tool: p-value, effect size, and confidence interval on whether agent behavior actually changed.
      1
      47 PyPI
      Apache 2.0
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Exposes a deterministic AI-slop scanner and RAG grounding grader as MCP Tools, Resource, and Prompt, enabling any MCP client to evaluate text quality and context faithfulness.
      MIT

    TDQS

    A4.1/5.0

    Scored across 3 tools

    Disambiguation5/5

    Each tool has a distinct and clearly separated purpose: comparing outputs, listing built-in behaviors, and running a behavior test. No overlap or ambiguity.

    Naming Consistency5/5

    All tool names follow the same verb_noun pattern in snake_case: compare_outputs, list_builtin_behaviors, run_behavior_test. Perfectly consistent.

    Tool Count4/5

    Three tools is small but sufficient for the server's focused domain of LLM behavior testing. The set covers the essential operations without being overly minimal.

    Completeness4/5

    The tools cover listing available behaviors, running a test, and comparing outputs. While additional features like adding custom behaviors could be useful, the core workflow is complete.

    Maintenance

    ActivityInactive
    ResponsivenessNo issues