A
licenseNot graded
qualityB
maintenanceEnables natural-language testing of MCP servers—covering tools, resources, prompts, contracts, and transports—without writing test code, with deterministic validation and CI integration.
234 npm
Apache 2.0
mcp-llm-behave
by Swanand33
Related Servers
Alternatives to mcp-llm-behave
No user-submitted related servers found.
Related Servers
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityBmaintenanceProvides MCP tools for semantic search over personal knowledge sources using pluggable embeddings and local vector indexing.1MIT
- FlicenseNot gradedqualityBmaintenanceProvides MCP tools that give LLM agents a full QA engineer workflow: scanning projects, generating deterministic test suites, executing them across browser/API/mobile, diagnosing failures, and proposing fixes that require human approval.-
- AlicenseAqualityCmaintenanceMCP server exposing statistical regression testing for LLM agents as a "run" tool: p-value, effect size, and confidence interval on whether agent behavior actually changed.174 PyPIApache 2.0
- FlicenseNot gradedqualityBmaintenanceExposes a deterministic AI-slop scanner and RAG grounding grader as MCP Tools, Resource, and Prompt, enabling any MCP client to evaluate text quality and context faithfulness.-
Patronus MCP Serverofficial
AlicenseNot gradedqualityDmaintenanceEnables running LLM evaluations, experiments, and custom evaluators through a standardized MCP interface.16Apache 2.0
TDQS
A4.1/5.0
Scored across 3 tools
Disambiguation5/5
Each tool has a distinct and clearly separated purpose: comparing outputs, listing built-in behaviors, and running a behavior test. No overlap or ambiguity.
Naming Consistency5/5
All tool names follow the same verb_noun pattern in snake_case: compare_outputs, list_builtin_behaviors, run_behavior_test. Perfectly consistent.
Tool Count4/5
Three tools is small but sufficient for the server's focused domain of LLM behavior testing. The set covers the essential operations without being overly minimal.
Completeness4/5
The tools cover listing available behaviors, running a test, and comparing outputs. While additional features like adding custom behaviors could be useful, the core workflow is complete.
Maintenance
ActivityInactive
ResponsivenessNo issues