Employee Leave Management MCP Server
Server Configuration
Describes the environment variables required to run the server.
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
No arguments | |||
Instructions
Guidance the server publishes about itself, which clients place ahead of the tool catalog so the model reads it before choosing anything.
This server publishes no instructions, or was last inspected before Glama recorded them.
Capabilities
Features and capabilities supported by this server
Protocol revision2025-11-25
| Capability | Details |
|---|---|
| tools | {
"listChanged": false
} |
| prompts | {
"listChanged": false
} |
| resources | {
"subscribe": false,
"listChanged": false
} |
| experimental | {} |
Tools
Functions exposed to the LLM to take actions
| Name | Description |
|---|---|
| apply_for_leaveA | Submit a leave request for an employee. Dates use ISO format (YYYY-MM-DD). The number of working days is computed automatically and checked against the remaining balance. Returns the created request as a dictionary. |
| approve_leaveC | Approve a pending leave request and deduct the days from the balance. |
| reject_leaveB | Reject a pending leave request. The balance is left unchanged. |
| cancel_leaveA | Cancel a leave request. If it was already approved, the days are credited back to the employee's balance. |
| list_pending_requestsB | List all pending leave requests for employees reporting to a manager. |
| check_leave_balanceA | Return the remaining balance for each leave type for an employee. |
Prompts
Interactive templates invoked by user choice
| Name | Description |
|---|---|
| draft_leave_request | prompt to draft a polite leave request message. |
| draft_decision | prompt to draft a manager's decision message. |
Resources
Contextual data attached and managed by the client
| Name | Description |
|---|---|
| get_leave_policy | Read the standard annual leave entitlement policy. |
TDQS
Scored across 6 tools
Each tool targets a distinct lifecycle action (apply, approve, reject, cancel, list, check) with no obvious overlaps. The only minor potential confusion is between approve/reject/cancel, all acting on pending requests, but their differing effects on balance make them clearly distinct.
All tools follow a consistent verb_noun naming pattern (apply_for_leave, approve_leave, reject_leave, cancel_leave, list_pending_requests, check_leave_balance). The verbs are clear and uniform, with snake_case throughout.
Six tools is well-scoped for a leave management domain, covering the full request lifecycle plus balance and listing queries. No tool feels redundant or unnecessary, and none are missing within the core scope.
The surface covers the full request lifecycle (apply, approve, reject, cancel) plus balance checking and pending listing. Minor gaps exist—such as no update_leave for modifying a request or a get_leave for viewing individual approved requests—but core workflows are covered.