mcp-doorman
by Sushank05
README.md
# mcp-doorman
**The security gateway for MCP servers โ every tool call gets checked at the door.**
[CI](https://github.com/YOUR_GITHUB_USERNAME/mcp-doorman/actions/workflows/ci.yml)
[npm](https://www.npmjs.com/package/mcp-doorman)
[License: Apache-2.0](LICENSE)
[PRs welcome](CONTRIBUTING.md)
`mcp-doorman` is a drop-in proxy that sits between your AI agent (Claude Desktop, Claude Code, Cursor, VS Code, any MCP client) and the MCP servers it uses. One command, zero infrastructure, and every `tools/list` and `tools/call` passes through a guard pipeline:
- ๐ **Policy engine** โ allow / deny / require-approval rules per tool, glob-matched
- ๐ต๏ธ **Secret redaction** โ AWS keys, GitHub/Slack/Stripe/OpenAI/Anthropic tokens, private keys, JWTs, cards (Luhn-checked)โฆ scrubbed from tool results *before* they reach the model
- ๐ **Prompt-injection screening** โ flags or blocks tool results (and tool *descriptions* โ tool poisoning) that try to instruct the model
- ๐ **Rug-pull detection** โ tool definitions are hash-pinned on first use; if a server silently swaps a description, the tool is blocked until a human re-pins it
- ๐ฆ **Rate limiting** โ per-tool token buckets cap the blast radius of a runaway agent loop
- ๐ **Human approval gates** โ sensitive tools trigger an interactive approval prompt via [MCP elicitation](https://modelcontextprotocol.io/specification/draft/client/elicitation), right in your client
- ๐งพ **Audit log** โ every call, denial, redaction, and flag lands in an append-only JSONL file
## Why this exists
Everyone is one `npx some-random-mcp-server` away from handing an unvetted process their API keys and a direct line into their model's context window. The documented attack classes are real, not hypothetical:
| Attack | How it works |
| ----------------------------- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- |
| **Tool poisoning** | Malicious instructions hidden in a tool's *description*, invisible in most client UIs |
| **Rug pull** | Server presents innocent tools on day 1, swaps the definitions after you've approved them |
| **Indirect prompt injection** | A webpage/issue/email fetched by a *legitimate* tool carries instructions aimed at the model |
| **Secret exfiltration** | A leaked credential in one tool result + one injected instruction = your key on someone else's server |
| **Runaway loops** | A confused or hijacked agent mass-deletes, mass-mails, mass-scrapes |
Enterprise MCP gateways exist for platform teams with Kubernetes clusters. **Nothing lightweight guards the individual developer's laptop โ the place where 99% of MCP servers actually run.** That's the gap this project fills.
## Quickstart (60 seconds)
```bash
# 1. Create a config
npx -y mcp-doorman init
# 2. Edit doorman.config.json โ put your real servers in it
# 3. Pin the current tool definitions (trust on first use)
npx -y mcp-doorman pin --config doorman.config.json
```
Then point your client at the gateway **instead of** your servers. Claude Desktop / Claude Code / Cursor:
```jsonc
// BEFORE โ every server talks straight to the model
{
"mcpServers": {
"github": { "command": "npx", "args": ["-y", "@modelcontextprotocol/server-github"] },
"filesystem": { "command": "npx", "args": ["-y", "@modelcontextprotocol/server-filesystem", "/repos"] }
}
}
// AFTER โ one doorman guards them all
{
"mcpServers": {
"doorman": {
"command": "npx",
"args": ["-y", "mcp-doorman", "run", "--config", "/absolute/path/to/doorman.config.json"]
}
}
}
```
Tools show up namespaced as `github__create_issue`, `filesystem__read_file`, etc., plus two built-ins: `doorman__status` and `doorman__recent_events` (ask your agent *"what did doorman block recently?"*).
> **Windows note:** if a server entry uses `npx` directly, spawn it through cmd: `"command": "cmd", "args": ["/c", "npx", "-y", "..."]`.
## See it work
```bash
git clone https://github.com/Sushank05/mcp-doorman && cd mcp-doorman
npm install
npm run demo
```
The demo wires the gateway to a deliberately misbehaving server ([examples/demo-server.mjs](examples/demo-server.mjs)) that leaks fake credentials, serves a prompt-injection payload, and offers a destructive tool โ and shows each guard catching it.
## How it works
```mermaid
flowchart LR
A["MCP client\n(Claude Desktop, Cursor, ...)"] -- stdio --> D
subgraph D [mcp-doorman]
direction TB
P[policy] --> R[rate limit] --> AP[approval] --> RD[redaction] --> I[injection scan] --> AU[(audit log)]
end
D -- stdio --> S1[github server]
D -- stdio --> S2[filesystem server]
D -- streamable HTTP --> S3[remote server]
```
The gateway is an MCP **server** toward your client and an MCP **client** toward every upstream (stdio child processes or streamable-HTTP endpoints), aggregating them behind one connection. It is built on the official [TypeScript SDK](https://github.com/modelcontextprotocol/typescript-sdk).
## Configuration
Everything lives in one JSON file. Full example with every option:
```jsonc
{
"servers": {
"github": {
"command": "npx",
"args": ["-y", "@modelcontextprotocol/server-github"],
"env": { "GITHUB_PERSONAL_ACCESS_TOKEN": "${GITHUB_TOKEN}" } // ${VAR} = read from gateway env
},
"remote": { "url": "https://mcp.example.com/mcp", "headers": { "Authorization": "Bearer ${MCP_TOKEN}" } }
},
"policy": {
"defaultAction": "allow", // "allow" | "deny" | "approve"
"rules": [ // first match wins, evaluated top-down
{ "match": "*__delete*", "action": "deny", "reason": "no destructive tools" },
{ "match": ["github__create_*", "*__send_*"], "action": "approve" },
{ "match": "filesystem__*", "action": "allow" }
]
},
"redaction": {
"enabled": true,
"disable": [], // built-in rule names to turn off
"enableOptIn": ["email"], // opt-ins: "email", "us-ssn", "ipv4"
"custom": [{ "name": "acme-id", "pattern": "ACME-[0-9]{6}" }],
"redactArguments": false // also scrub model-supplied arguments
},
"injection": {
"action": "flag", // "flag" (warn the model) | "block" | "off"
"scanToolDescriptions": true, // tool-poisoning check on tools/list
"custom": []
},
"pinning": {
"enabled": true,
"onNewTool": "pin", // "pin" (TOFU) | "block" (until `mcp-doorman pin`)
"onChangedTool": "block" // "block" | "warn"
},
"rateLimit": { "perMinute": 120, "perTool": { "*__send_*": 5 } },
"approval": { "fallback": "deny", "timeoutMs": 120000 }, // fallback when client lacks elicitation
"audit": { "enabled": true, "includeArguments": true, "includeResults": false },
"logLevel": "info"
}
```
Pin state and the audit log default to `<config-name>.pins.json` / `<config-name>.audit.jsonl` next to the config file.
### CLI
| Command | What it does |
| --------------------------------- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------- |
| `mcp-doorman run --config <path>` | Start the gateway over stdio (default command) |
| `mcp-doorman pin --config <path>` | Connect to all upstreams and pin (trust) their current tool definitions |
| `mcp-doorman init` | Write a starter config with sensible defaults |
## Honest limitations
Security tooling that oversells is worse than none. Read this part.
- **Heuristics are bypassable.** The injection patterns catch documented, common attack shapes. A motivated attacker can phrase around any regex. Use `deny`/`approve` policies as the hard boundary; screening is defense-in-depth.
- **Redaction is best-effort.** Known token formats are caught reliably; a random hex secret with no context is not. Don't point agents at credential stores.
- **This is not a sandbox.** Upstream servers still run as child processes with your user's privileges. Doorman guards the *protocol*; pair it with containers ([ToolHive](https://github.com/stacklok/toolhive)-style) to guard the *process*.
- **TOFU trusts first sight.** Pinning detects *changes*, not tools that were malicious from day one โ that's what the description scanner and your own review are for.
- **Approval gates need elicitation.** Clients without elicitation support fall back to `approval.fallback` (deny by default).
## Roadmap โ help wanted ๐
- [ ] `resources/*` and `prompts/*` proxying (currently tools-only)
- [ ] Pass-through for sampling and roots
- [ ] Community rule packs (`doorman-rules-finance`, `doorman-rules-healthcare`โฆ)
- [ ] Learning mode: observe for a week, propose a least-privilege policy
- [ ] OPA / Cedar policy backends
- [ ] `mcp-doorman audit` subcommand: pretty-print and query the JSONL log
- [ ] Web dashboard for audit visualization
- [ ] Entropy-based generic secret detection
Grab anything above, or start with a `[good first issue](https://github.com/YOUR_GITHUB_USERNAME/mcp-doorman/labels/good%20first%20issue)`. New detection rules are the easiest contribution: one regex + two tests. See [CONTRIBUTING.md](CONTRIBUTING.md) and [docs/detection-rules.md](docs/detection-rules.md).
## Development
```bash
npm install
npm test # 69 tests: unit + full stdio e2e
npm run build
npm run demo # watch the guards fire live
```
## License
[Apache-2.0](LICENSE) โ free for any use, with an explicit patent grant.This server cannot be deployed
Maintenance
ActivityStale
ResponsivenessNo issues