Skip to main content
Glama
SureshKhemka

constraints-registry-mcp

by SureshKhemka
OverviewSchemaSourceRelated ServersDiscussionsAdmin
Python
Hybrid

Related Servers

Alternatives to constraints-registry-mcp

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • project-brain-mcp

      AiraAlfredSF
      A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      An MCP server that provides CLI coding agents with persistent decision memory, codebase dependency-graph awareness, plan validation against architectural constraints, and a self-bootstrapping constraints.md file.
      7 npm
      MIT

    • PactAI MCP

      hexablob
      A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Serves coding agents with project-specific knowledge (decisions, conventions, constraints) over MCP and provides verification verdicts on whether code still complies.
      365 npm
      AGPL 3.0
    • testigo-recall-mcp by testigo-recall

      testigo-recall-mcpofficial

      testigo-recall
      F
      license
      A
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      MCP server that exposes pre-extracted facts about code behavior, design decisions, and assumptions to AI agents, saving time and tokens by avoiding direct source file reading.
      6
      -
    Deploy Server
    One endpoint for every MCP toolRayrun runs every MCP server behind one URL and holds the credentials. Each call is decided per client, tool, and argument, then recorded.ray.runAd

    TDQS

    A4.2/5.0

    Scored across 3 tools

    Disambiguation5/5

    Each tool has a clearly distinct purpose: describe_scope discovers valid scope values, get_constraints retrieves constraints, and validate checks artifacts. No overlap or ambiguity.

    Naming Consistency5/5

    All tool names follow a consistent verb_noun pattern: describe_scope, get_constraints, validate. The pattern is predictable and clear.

    Tool Count5/5

    Three tools are well-scoped for a constraints registry: discover vocabulary, retrieve constraints, and validate. Each tool earns its place without unnecessary bulk.

    Completeness4/5

    The set covers the core workflow (discover, fetch, validate). Minor gap: no explicit tool to list all constraint definitions without scope filtering, but the design intentionally omits scope-agnostic retrieval.

    Maintenance

    ActivityInactive
    ResponsivenessNo issues

    Resources