myopic
Reviews GitHub pull requests, reads the change, reviews against the whole codebase, and posts inline comments.
Reviews GitLab merge requests, reads the change, reviews against the whole codebase, and posts inline comments.
Provides semantic code search using a local Ollama server with an embedding model, enabling similarity-based code retrieval and review context enrichment.
Click on "Install Server".
Wait a few minutes for the server to deploy. Once ready, it will show a "Started" state.
In the chat, type
@followed by the MCP server name and your instructions, e.g., "@myopicreview merge request https://gitlab.com/owner/repo/-/merge_requests/1"
That's it! The server will respond to your query, and you can continue using it as needed.
Here is a step-by-step guide with screenshots.
myopic
The code-review MCP with the most ironic name in the registry. It's anything but nearsighted — it reviews your merge request against the whole codebase, not just the diff in front of it.
Building in public. Reviews GitLab merge requests and GitHub pull requests — pass either URL. Reads the change, reviews it against the whole codebase, and can post the review back as inline comments. Issues and PRs welcome.
Why
The bugs that matter rarely live in the diff. They live in what it doesn't show: the caller three files away that now breaks, the convention every sibling file follows that this one quietly drops, the helper that already exists so this new one is a duplicate. A reviewer that only reads the patch is myopic.
myopic is an open-source MCP server that gives the AI client you already use (Claude, Cursor, …) the structured context to review like someone who knows the codebase. It runs on your machine — your code never leaves it, there's no per-PR bill, and the review happens in your own agent with your own standards:
Read the change precisely — the diff as line-numbered hunks or grouped by function/class, token-safe on any MR size (a 10,000-line diff never overflows the context window).
Review it against the whole codebase — who calls the changed code (blast radius), the caller/callee graph, and — optionally — semantically similar code so you catch broken conventions and duplication.
It pairs with amnesic, my MCP server that gives AI persistent memory of SQL databases.
Related MCP server: Gemini Code Review MCP
Tools
Everything below works today unless marked planned.
Read the merge request (token-safe by construction):
Tool | What it does |
| MR metadata + every discussion thread + resolved/unresolved, in one call |
| a content-free manifest of changed files (paths, stats, noise flags) — no diff content, so it stays small even on a huge MR |
| the diff grouped by function/class (AST-aware), budget-bounded |
| the diff as line-numbered hunks — exact positions for inline comments — budget-bounded |
On a large MR, the diff tools return a bounded page and list the rest under
omitted_files / truncated instead of failing; lockfiles, generated code, and
binaries are listed but not expanded. Fetch the rest with files_filter.
Review against the whole codebase (point at a local clone):
Tool | What it does |
| everywhere a changed symbol is used — the blast radius (ripgrep + tree-sitter) |
| the caller/callee graph of a symbol |
| the headline — for each changed symbol: its impact (always), plus semantically similar code when the optional layer is enabled |
Semantic layer (built in — needs Ollama) — index_repo, code_search,
and the semantic half of mr_review_context. See below.
Close the loop — verify, and (on request) comment:
Tool | What it does |
| for each existing review thread, the diff changes near the commented line — did a follow-up commit address it? (read-only) |
| the one write — post inline comments, one at a time from a queue with exponential backoff (no drafts, no bulk-publish), so partial progress survives and rate limits are respected |
See ROADMAP.md for what's next.
Install
pipx installs myopic isolated and on your PATH:
pipx install myopicPrefer a plain venv? python3 -m venv ~/.venvs/myopic && ~/.venvs/myopic/bin/pip install myopic, then use that binary where the examples say myopic.
Setup
myopic needs a personal access token with api (or read_api) scope. The wizard
walks you through it:
myopic init # prompts for URL + token, verifies, saves both
myopic test # ✓ Authenticated to https://gitlab.com as <you>
myopic doctor # health-check config + (if enabled) the semantic layerThe token is saved to ~/.config/myopic/.env (chmod 600) and referenced from the
TOML as ${GITLAB_TOKEN} — never in the config file itself. Rotate it with
myopic set-secret, or hand-edit via myopic init --template.
GitHub PRs: just pass a PR URL. Set a GITHUB_TOKEN (a PAT with
pull-request read access) in your environment or a [github] section in
config.toml. For GitHub Enterprise, set [github].url to your host.
Add to your AI client
Claude Code — one command, no config editing:
/plugin marketplace add https://github.com/SurajKGoyal/myopic-marketplace
/plugin install myopic@myopicAny other MCP client (Cursor, Claude Desktop, …) — point it at the myopic
command:
{
"mcpServers": {
"myopic": {
"command": "myopic"
}
}
}If your client can't find it on PATH, use the absolute path (pipx installs to
~/.local/bin/myopic).
Configure inline instead of myopic init
Put the token in the env block and skip the config file — myopic reads
GITLAB_TOKEN / GITHUB_TOKEN from the environment:
{
"mcpServers": {
"myopic": {
"command": "myopic",
"env": { "GITLAB_TOKEN": "glpat-…", "MYOPIC_AUTO_PULL": "1" }
}
}
}MYOPIC_AUTO_PULL=1 (optional) pulls a missing embedding model on first use
instead of erroring.
Use
Point your AI at a merge request:
"Review this MR: https://gitlab.com/group/project/-/merge_requests/42"
A good flow the client can follow: mr_changed_files to see the shape →
mr_diff_sections (large MRs) or mr_diff_lines to read the change → then, with
a local clone checked out, dependency_impact / trace_call_chain (or
mr_review_context) on the risky changed symbols to review against everything
that depends on them.
The graph tools analyze whatever is checked out at root, so check out the MR's
branch first — otherwise you're reviewing the target branch, and the MR's new
code isn't there. myopic worktree <mr-url> <repo> checks out the MR head in a
throwaway worktree (your main checkout untouched) and prints the path to use as
root. mr_review_context also warns when root doesn't hold the MR's head.
Semantic search (built in — needs Ollama)
For "is this consistent with the rest of the codebase?" — duplication, convention drift, similar patterns — the semantic layer covers it. It's bundled in the base install (lancedb + httpx); the only external requirement is a running Ollama.
Embeddings come from a local Ollama server you run — your code never leaves your machine. myopic talks to Ollama over HTTP; it does not bundle or launch it. The one-time prerequisites:
Ollama running (default
localhost:11434, or setMYOPIC_OLLAMA_URL).The embedding model pulled:
ollama pull unclemusclez/jina-embeddings-v2-base-code.
myopic doctor checks both and offers to pull the model for you.
Embeddings are stored in an embedded LanceDB index with
hybrid (vector + full-text) search, and mr_review_context enriches each changed
symbol with semantically similar code. You don't run index_repo by hand —
it indexes the repo on the first review and refreshes when stale, automatically
(disable with MYOPIC_AUTO_INDEX=0; the graph pass needs no index and always
runs). index_repo / myopic index remain for explicit/cron use.
Indexing is incremental and freshness-aware. The first index_repo is a full
build; after that only files whose content changed are re-embedded, so refreshing
is cheap. index_status(root) reports whether the index is fresh, stale (with
how many commits behind main), or built on a different model — freshness is
measured against the repo's main line, not the current checkout, so reviewing
a feature branch never marks the index stale; only main actually moving does.
code_search and
mr_review_context carry that status so a stale index never silently degrades a
review; the AI is told to offer a refresh when it's stale.
The index is per repository, not per checkout — a myopic worktree at an MR's
head shares its clone's index, so reviewing a new branch never rebuilds it; only
the files that branch changed get re-embedded.
A separate clone of the same repo does get its own index, and a repo you delete leaves one behind. Indexing drops such dead copies automatically; to review and reclaim them yourself:
myopic prune # dry-run: what's stale, and how much it's costing
myopic prune --apply # delete themA second clone you still use keeps its index — only unreachable ones are removed.
myopic is a stdio server (no background process), so there's no built-in
scheduler — but myopic index /path/to/repo is the hook for one. Point cron or
launchd at it to keep an index fresh out of band:
# refresh hourly (incremental — usually seconds)
0 * * * * myopic index /path/to/repoOverride the model/endpoint with MYOPIC_EMBED_MODEL / MYOPIC_OLLAMA_URL.
Configuration reference
Source | Key | Notes |
|
| GitLab base URL (default |
|
| use |
|
| the actual token value (chmod 600) |
env var |
| fallback if no TOML |
env var |
| fallback if no TOML |
env var |
| override the config file / directory |
env var |
| semantic layer model + endpoint |
env var |
|
|
env var |
|
|
Security
One explicit write, everything else read-only. Only
mr_post_commentsmutates a review, and only when you ask for it — every other tool just reads MR and repo data. The write is never speculative.Your token stays local. It lives in your
.env/ environment and is sent only to your configured GitLab instance — never to any third party.Auth errors are scrubbed so your token never leaks into error messages.
The semantic layer runs entirely locally (your Ollama, an on-disk index) — your code is never sent to a third party.
Development
pip install -e ".[dev]"
pytest # hermetic — no network, Ollama, or lancedb neededLicense
MIT © Suraj Goyal
mcp-name: io.github.SurajKGoyal/myopic
This server cannot be installed
Maintenance
Resources
Unclaimed servers have limited discoverability.
Looking for Admin?
If you are the server author, to access and configure the admin panel.
Related MCP Servers
- Flicense-qualityDmaintenanceAn MCP server that automates code reviews through linting, testing, and git diff analysis. It also generates conventional commit messages and detailed pull request descriptions based on file changes and code patterns.Last updated
- AlicenseBqualityCmaintenanceAI-powered code review server that analyzes git diffs and PRs with context from project guidelines and task lists. Supports integration with Claude Code and Cursor via MCP.Last updated31MIT
- Alicense-qualityDmaintenanceOpen-source AI code review MCP server for local git diff auditing with deterministic security rules and AI-powered analysis using any OpenAI-compatible model.Last updated4MIT
- Alicense-qualityDmaintenanceAn MCP server that performs automated code reviews by analyzing git diffs against configurable review standards with custom reviewer personas.Last updated2MIT
Related MCP Connectors
A MCP server built for developers enabling Git based project management with project and personal…
AI code review for GitHub PRs with an MCP autofix loop for Claude Code and Cursor
A Model Context Protocol (MCP) application for automated GitHub PR analysis and issue management.…
Latest Blog Posts
- Who's Calling? MCP Hosts Are an Identity Blind Spot (And the Spec Knows It)By Om-Shree-0709 on .mcpAgent IdentityOAuth 2.1
- Your AI Chatbot Just Exposed Your CEO's Salary to an InternBy Om-Shree-0709 on .Agent IdentityMCP SecurityOAuth Delegation
- Why MCP Servers Need Execution Sandboxing (And Why Your Current Stack Isn't Enough)By Om-Shree-0709 on .Agentic AiPrompt InjectionWebAssembly
MCP directory API
We provide all the information about MCP servers via our MCP API.
curl -X GET 'https://glama.ai/api/mcp/v1/servers/SurajKGoyal/myopic'
If you have feedback or need assistance with the MCP directory API, please join our Discord server