JIRA MCP Server
Related Servers
Alternatives to JIRA MCP Server
No user-submitted related servers found.
Related Servers
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityDmaintenanceAn MCP server for interacting with Jira Cloud, providing tools for issues, search, agile boards, comments, links, attachments, and webhook notifications.7 npm2MIT
- AlicenseAqualityCmaintenanceAn MCP server for interacting with Atlassian Jira, enabling issue management, attachments, and other operations via natural language.715,675 npmISC
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityDmaintenanceAn MCP server for Jira that enables comprehensive issue management, sprint operations, comments, attachments, and batch processing with localization and flexible date support.625 npm2MIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityDmaintenanceAn MCP server for integrating with Jira Server instances, enabling natural language interactions to create, update, search, and manage issues and comments.73 npm1MIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityDmaintenanceA comprehensive MCP server for Atlassian Jira that enables AI assistants to manage issues, sprints, comments, and worklogs through natural language.MIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityAmaintenanceMCP server for interacting with Jira Cloud instances. Enables issue management, JQL queries, project and sprint management, and batch operations via natural language interfaces.206 npm4MIT
TDQS
Scored across 23 tools
Each tool targets a distinct resource and action, with clear separation between issues, sprints, boards, attachments, comments, and fields. Even similar tools like get_sprint_issues vs get_my_sprint_issues have explicit filters that differentiate them.
All tools follow a consistent 'jira_' prefix followed by verb_noun (e.g., get_issue, create_issue, list_sprints). The verb set is predictable and the object is always the resource type, making the naming pattern uniform and intuitive.
23 tools borders on heavy, but the complexity of JIRA's domain justifies a comprehensive set. That said, a more minimalist server could merge some functions (e.g., list_attachments with get_issue) to reduce count without losing clarity.
Core issue lifecycle (create, read, update, transition, comment, attachment) is fully covered, and sprint/board features are well represented. Missing delete, sprint creation/update, and project listing are minor gaps that agents can work around.