Skip to main content
Glama

Related Servers

Alternatives to ctxfeed

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • A
      license
      A
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      MCP server that helps AI coding agents understand a repository by providing lightweight tree/map, code search, and token-budgeted context packing tools without dumping the entire monorepo into the prompt.
      3
      9 npm
      105
      MIT
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      A
      maintenance
      An MCP server that indexes codebases into a local graph and provides on-demand context retrieval for AI coding agents, reducing token usage by tracking session history and delivering only relevant code subgraphs.
      14 npm
      MIT
    • A
      license
      A
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      An MCP server giving coding agents context-window-aware code search and safe, atomic multi-file edits — built to cut token usage on large codebases without sacrificing correctness.
      3
      132 npm
      5
      MIT
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      MCP server that reduces AI agent token usage by up to 90% through intelligent context compression. Enables efficient code exploration, multi-file refactoring, and debugging by providing tools for smart reading, searching, and managing code context.
      4
      MIT
    • A
      license
      A
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      An MCP server that indexes reference repositories and provides tools for AI coding agents to retrieve lossless code context, enabling reasoning over codebases larger than the agent's context window.
      8
      2
      Apache 2.0
    • A
      license
      A
      quality
      A
      maintenance
      Local-first MCP server that gives any AI coding agent per-project memory, workflow intelligence, and always-on, lossless token & context optimization.
      37
      12 npm
      5
      MIT

    TDQS

    B3.4/5.0

    Scored across 3 tools

    Disambiguation5/5

    query_repo, list_files, and cost_delta each perform a clearly distinct action: answering a question, inventorying served files, and reporting cost metrics. There is no overlap, so an agent can easily select the right tool.

    Naming Consistency4/5

    All names use snake_case consistently and are readable. However, query_repo and list_files follow a verb_noun pattern while cost_delta is a noun phrase, which is a minor deviation from a fully predictable convention.

    Tool Count4/5

    Three tools is a tight but reasonable scope for a read-only repo-context server. Each tool has a distinct role, though cost_delta is more auxiliary than the core query/list functions, making the set feel slightly minimal rather than perfectly balanced.

    Completeness4/5

    The surface covers listing ingestible files, querying the whole repo in-context, and comparing per-query cost. Gaps exist for targeted file queries, filtering, or partial-repo selection, but the whole-repo query and file listing let agents work around these limitations.

    Maintenance

    ActivityActive
    ResponsivenessNo issues