SuperInstance MCP Server
OfficialRelated Servers
Alternatives to SuperInstance MCP Server
No user-submitted related servers found.
Related Servers
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityAmaintenanceEnables Claude Code sessions to query fleet status, focus terminals, and manage sessions programmatically via MCP tools.1MIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityDmaintenanceEnables discovery, search, and invocation of A2A AI agents from within Claude Code, allowing users to find and interact with agents for various tasks.MIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityDmaintenanceEnables Claude to connect and interact with A2A Protocol agents, allowing discovery of agent capabilities, sending messages to remote agents, managing multi-turn conversations, and viewing artifacts returned by agents.16Apache 2.0
- AlicenseCqualityCmaintenanceEnables Claude and Claude Code to manage AACWorkflow tasks, agents, projects, squads, autopilots, and analytics through natural language.69MIT
- FlicenseAqualityDmaintenanceEnables querying live AWS spot price arbitrage signals and suppression logs directly in Claude Code or any MCP-compatible AI tool.6-
- AlicenseAqualityAmaintenanceEnables agent managers to launch and supervise Antigravity CLI, Claude Code, CodeBuddy Code, or Grok CLI as subagents through local MCP tools for starting, waiting on, and cancelling invocations.4MIT
TDQS
Scored across 8 tools
Each tool targets a distinct function: conservation checking, crate info, ecosystem stats, fleet listing, budget calculation, semantic search, fleet status, and ternary validation. No two tools have overlapping purposes.
Tools predominantly use snake_case with noun-based names (e.g., fleet_agents, crate_info). 'ternary_validate' and 'conservation_check' place the verb at the end, introducing slight inconsistency, but overall the pattern is predictable.
With 8 tools, the server is well-scoped for its apparent purpose of querying and verifying aspects of the SuperInstance ecosystem. Neither too sparse nor overloaded.
The tools cover key informational needs (stats, status, search, validation) but lack any write or action-oriented operations (e.g., create crate, deploy agent, submit theorem). This leaves notable gaps for a system that involves active management.