Skip to main content
Glama
SuperAngryMonkey

iris

by SuperAngryMonkey
OverviewSchemaSourceRelated ServersDiscussionsAdmin
Python
Remote

Related Servers

Alternatives to iris

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • mail-mcp

      JACKWULA123
      A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      Enables AI coding agents to search, read, and manage drafts across Gmail and Outlook mailboxes via MCP.
      MIT

    • ckm365

      clearkan
      A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Enables secure, multi-tenant Microsoft 365 mail and calendar management through Microsoft Graph, with tiered permissions, draft-only compose flows, and support for Claude Code, pydantic-ai, and programmatic access.
      MIT

    • outlook-mcp

      dbfournier33
      A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      An MCP server that gives AI agents structured access to a Microsoft Outlook mailbox through the Microsoft Graph API, with a deliberate constraint: agents can read and draft emails, but only humans can send.
      167 npm
      MIT

    • @dockndevai/mcp-outlook

      dockndevai
      A
      license
      A
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Enables AI agents to read, search, draft, send, reply to, forward, and organize Microsoft Outlook mail via Microsoft Graph, with safe-by-default read-only operation and browser-based sign-in.
      11
      61 npm
      MIT

    • Outlook MCP Server

      sughosh-anney
      A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Enables an AI agent to send or draft email as the signed-in user through Microsoft Graph, including multiple recipients, HTML or plain-text bodies, and file attachments. Uses delegated least-privilege PKCE authentication so messages can be staged as drafts for approval or sent directly.
      MIT
    Deploy Server
    One endpoint for every MCP toolRayrun runs every MCP server behind one URL and holds the credentials. Each call is decided per client, tool, and argument, then recorded.ray.runAd

    TDQS

    A4.2/5.0

    Scored across 12 tools

    Disambiguation5/5

    Each tool targets a clearly distinct operation: authentication steps, auth status, folder listing, message listing/search/get/thread, and draft create/update/delete. There is no overlapping purpose or realistic chance of selecting the wrong tool for a task.

    Naming Consistency4/5

    Names consistently use the iris_ prefix and are mostly verb_noun (create_draft, list_messages, get_thread, delete_draft). Minor deviations like iris_auth_status and iris_login_finish are still readable and do not obscure intent.

    Tool Count5/5

    Twelve tools is well within the ideal range and each one earns its place: three auth-related tools, three message retrieval/search tools, folder discovery, and five draft lifecycle operations. Nothing feels redundant or missing at the core level.

    Completeness4/5

    The set covers authentication, folder navigation, message search/read/thread retrieval, and the full draft CRUD lifecycle, so agents can accomplish end-to-end drafting workflows. It deliberately omits sending and attachment content download, which is an explicit design choice rather than a gap that causes failures.

    Maintenance

    ActivityActive
    ResponsivenessNo issues

    Resources