Skip to main content
Glama
Sunye1213106

ascendc-codemap-mcp

by Sunye1213106

Related Servers

Alternatives to ascendc-codemap-mcp

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Enables coding agents to query a local, multi-repo code graph for symbol exploration, blast radius analysis, co-change mining, and durable code-anchored memory via MCP tools.
      106 npm
      14
      Business Source 1.1
    • F
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      A
      maintenance
      Enables AI coding agents to query a semantic code graph over MCP, retrieving exact function source, definitions, callers/callees, impact analysis, and minimal test selection instead of whole files.
      12
      -
    • F
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Enables coding agents to query a local-first code intelligence graph of Python repositories—covering functions, classes, modules, and their relationships—via MCP, supporting subgraph retrieval, caller lookup, and impact analysis without re-reading the codebase.
      -
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Enables AI coding agents to query a local, continuously updated symbol graph of a codebase, providing ranked search, caller/callee exploration, dependency paths, and git-diff impact analysis through MCP tools.
      21 npm
      Apache 2.0
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Enables AI coding agents to index codebases into a queryable knowledge model and ask for the smallest architectural surface a task likely touches, with evidence, confidence, and freshness, via MCP tools.
      Apache 2.0

    TDQS

    A4/5.0

    Scored across 5 tools

    Disambiguation5/5

    Each tool maps to a distinct action: environment check, full build, incremental update, status check, and read-only query. The overlapping index/update pair is explicitly disambiguated by whether a .uo already exists.

    Naming Consistency3/5

    The names are readable and domain-consistent, but they do not follow one pattern: codemap_doctor/codemap_status use noun-first style, query_codemap is verb-first, and index_operator/update_operator use _operator suffix. This makes the naming less predictable across the set.

    Tool Count5/5

    Five tools is well-scoped for an operator CodeMap lifecycle: preflight, full index, incremental update, status, and query. No tool feels redundant at this granularity.

    Completeness4/5

    The surface covers the core lifecycle: build/rebuild, update, status, and query, plus environment validation. An explicit delete/cleanup tool is absent, but rebuild and update cover most recovery workflows.

    Maintenance

    ActivityMaintained
    ResponsivenessNo issues