Skip to main content
Glama
Sunwood-ai-labs

Iris MCP Server

by Sunwood-ai-labs
OverviewSchemaSourceRelated ServersDiscussionsAdmin
JavaScript
Hybrid

Related Servers

Alternatives to Iris MCP Server

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • GitHub MCP Server

      archish9
      A
      license
      A
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      A Model Context Protocol server that provides Git version control operations as structured tools for AI coding agents. It enables LLMs to programmatically manage repositories through actions like committing changes, rolling back code, and comparing diffs.
      10
      Apache 2.0

    • MCP Server

      Nawaf-TBE
      A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      A Node.js/TypeScript server implementing the Model Context Protocol that provides integrations with GitHub and Notion, allowing automated workflow between these platforms via API endpoints.
      1,026 npm
      MIT

    • MCP Notes Server

      dekdee
      A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      A Model Context Protocol (MCP) server for developer note-taking, allowing users to create, manage, and export development notes with tags, status, and priority.
      MIT
    Deploy Server
    One endpoint for every MCP toolRayrun runs every MCP server behind one URL and holds the credentials. Each call is decided per client, tool, and argument, then recorded.ray.runAd

    TDQS

    B3.2/5.0

    Scored across 1 tool

    Disambiguation5/5

    With only one tool, there is no possibility of ambiguity or overlap between tools. The tool's purpose is clearly defined as generating release notes from tag differences, making it impossible for an agent to confuse it with another tool.

    Naming Consistency5/5

    Since there is only a single tool, naming consistency is inherently perfect. The tool name 'generate_release_note' follows a clear verb_noun pattern, and there are no other tools to create inconsistency with.

    Tool Count2/5

    A single tool is too few for a server's purpose, as it severely limits functionality and suggests an incomplete or overly narrow scope. This makes the server feel thin and impractical for most agent workflows, as it lacks the breadth needed for typical operations in its domain.

    Completeness2/5

    The server is severely incomplete for any reasonable domain involving release notes. While the tool can generate notes, there are obvious gaps such as creating, updating, deleting, or listing release notes, and no coverage for related operations like managing tags or integrating with version control systems, which will cause agent failures in real-world scenarios.

    Maintenance

    ActivityInactive
    ResponsivenessNo issues

    Resources