Skip to main content
Glama

Related Servers

Alternatives to tteop-mcp

Related Servers

  • A
    license
    Not graded
    quality
    C
    maintenance
    Enables type-safe, bidirectional communication with Model Context Protocol services, allowing centralized management of model contexts over HTTP.
    207
    MIT
  • A
    license
    A
    quality
    B
    maintenance
    Enables agents to validate governed data records, map every value to installed target formats with per-value fidelity and Exceptional Value reporting, and inspect hash-chained audit logs. It supports outbound mapping workflows through the Model Context Protocol.
    6
    Apache 2.0
  • A
    license
    Not graded
    quality
    D
    maintenance
    Enables interaction with ExoSense IoT devices, sensors, groups, and assets via GraphQL, supporting device management and data queries through a Model Context Protocol interface.
    MIT
  • A
    license
    B
    quality
    D
    maintenance
    Enables persistent knowledge graph management with entities, observations, relations, temporal queries, and graph traversal via Model Context Protocol.
    13
    MIT

TDQS

A4.3/5.0

Scored across 4 tools

Disambiguation5/5

Each tool targets a distinct operation: building an envelope, validating a single envelope, describing protocol metadata, and running the conformance suite. Even though validate and conformance both involve validation, their scope is clearly separated and descriptions make the distinction obvious.

Naming Consistency5/5

All tool names share the tteop_ prefix and follow a consistent snake_case verb_noun pattern: validate_envelope, describe_protocol, run_conformance, build_envelope. This makes the tool set highly predictable.

Tool Count5/5

Four tools is well-scoped for a focused protocol-support server. Each tool serves a clear core workflow—build, validate, describe, and test—without unnecessary bloat or missing essentials.

Completeness4/5

The set covers the primary lifecycle for TTEOP envelopes: construction, validation, protocol introspection, and conformance testing. A minor gap is the lack of a dedicated parse/decode tool, but build and validate together cover the main practical workflows.

Maintenance

ActivityMaintained
ResponsivenessNo issues