Skip to main content
Glama
SunCreation

MCP Notion Server (@suncreation)

by SunCreation

notion_delete_block

Remove unwanted content blocks from Notion pages using block ID to maintain clean and organized workspaces.

Instructions

Delete a block in Notion

Input Schema

TableJSON Schema
NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
block_idYesThe ID of the block to delete.It should be a 32-character string (excluding hyphens) formatted as 8-4-4-4-12 with hyphens (-).
formatNoSpecify the response format. 'json' returns the original data structure, 'markdown' returns a more readable format. Use 'markdown' when the user only needs to read the page and isn't planning to write or modify it. Use 'json' when the user needs to read the page with the intention of writing to or modifying it.markdown

Schema Changelog

Changes observed during successful MCP inspections.

  1. First observedv1.0.6

TDQS

C2.9/5.0
Behavior2/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

The description only says 'Delete a block in Notion' without any behavioral details. Since no annotations are provided, the description should disclose side effects (e.g., cascading deletion of children), required permissions, or irreversibility. It does not.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness4/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is a single concise sentence with no wasted words. However, it is under-specified; a slightly longer description with key usage context would be more helpful without losing conciseness.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness2/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Given no output schema and no annotations, the description should provide more context about the tool's behavior, such as return value or effect on related blocks. The minimal description leaves the agent underinformed for a deletion operation.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters3/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

The input schema has 100% description coverage for its two parameters, so the schema already explains block_id format and format options. The description adds no new parameter meaning beyond the schema, resulting in a baseline score of 3.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose4/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description states the verb 'Delete' and the resource 'block in Notion', making the action clear. However, it does not distinguish this tool from siblings like notion_update_block or notion_retrieve_block, which also operate on blocks.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines2/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

No guidance is provided on when to use this tool versus alternatives. There is no mention of prerequisites, when not to use it, or how it relates to sibling tools like notion_append_block_children or notion_update_block.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.