chatgenius-mcp
OfficialRelated Servers
Alternatives to chatgenius-mcp
No user-submitted related servers found.
Related Servers
- AlicenseBqualityAmaintenanceConnects an MCP-compatible agent to a real Instagram, WhatsApp, or Messenger inbox, exposing 29 tools, 11 playbook prompts, and 2 resources for reading and writing conversations, messages, contacts, templates, journeys, campaigns, comments, and tickets. Includes guided zero-key setup, plan recommendation, and destructive-action hints so cautious agents can confirm state-changing operations.31299 npmMIT
- AlicenseBqualityBmaintenanceEnables MCP clients such as Claude and Cursor to invoke one tool per API operation for campaign management, audience import/export, conversation replies, account login jobs, and media uploads with scoped authentication.49MIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityDmaintenanceExposes Instagram actions (posts, media, comments, DMs, insights, Messenger profile) to Claude and ChatGPT via MCP.1MIT
- AlicenseBqualityAmaintenanceEnables AI agents and clients to discover accounts and channels, read scheduling and analytics data, and manage posts, content items, and templates through 41 GraphQL-backed tools with private credential profiles and confirmation-gated mutations.4127 npmAGPL 3.0

Chat33 MCP Serverofficial
AlicenseNot gradedqualityCmaintenanceEnables AI agents and MCP clients to publish and schedule posts across eight social networks, answer Instagram and Facebook DMs and comments, and build comment-to-DM automations through a hosted remote endpoint.MIT- AlicenseCqualityCmaintenanceProvides AI assistants with access to all public GoHighLevel API endpoints as MCP tools, enabling contact, conversation, opportunity, calendar, and other CRM operations with configurable safety gates for writes and deletes.5565 npm2MIT
TDQS
Scored across 105 tools
Most tools have distinct verbs and resource names, and the descriptions are unusually detailed, but the 105-tool surface creates real overlap: list_posts vs list_recent_posts, get_account vs get_overview, update_contact vs upsert_contact, and publish_flow vs activate_flow can be confused. Flow and comment-trigger lifecycle tools are numerous and require careful reading to choose correctly.
Tool names consistently use snake_case verb_noun patterns such as list_contacts, create_flow, publish_post, and cancel_appointment. Minor variations like bulk_approve_comment_replies and get_wins_and_opportunities still fit the convention.
At 105 tools, this is far beyond a practical MCP server scope and fits the rubric's extreme-mismatch range. The breadth spans contacts, conversations, flows, comment triggers, posts, competitors, knowledge, and AI config, creating heavy selection load even though individual tools are purposeful.
Coverage is broad and most domains have full lifecycle support: contacts, appointments, flows, comment triggers, posts, competitors, FAQs, services, and documents. Notable gaps remain, especially media upload for posts despite create_post referencing POST /posts/{id}/media, and there is no mutation tool for AI configuration beyond read-only getters.