search_papers

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

No annotations provided, so description carries full burden. It discloses search scope (all fields) and hints at simplicity relative to search_arxiv, but omits behaviors like pagination, sorting, or error handling. Adequate but not comprehensive.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

Three sentences, well-structured with purpose first. Efficient but could be slightly more concise by omitting redundant clarifications like 'just a search query plus...'.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Despite having an output schema, description covers only 3 of 4 parameters, missing max_results entirely. No guidance on category values or date_from format. The tool has moderate complexity (4 params) but description leaves significant gaps.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema description coverage is 0%, yet description only adds meaning for query, category, and date_from. It fails to explain max_results parameter or the expected format for date_from (e.g., YYYY-MM-DD). Parameter semantics are incomplete.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states the tool 'Search papers by query text, with optional category filter and date range' and mentions it searches across all fields. It distinguishes itself from search_arxiv, providing a specific verb and resource.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

Explicitly tells when to use: 'Use when the user provides a natural language query like...' and contrasts with search_arxiv. This gives clear context for selecting this tool over siblings.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.