Skip to main content
Glama
Sign In
Coding Agent MCP Server

Coding Agent MCP Server

by Sukarth
OverviewSchemaSourceRelated ServersDiscussionsAdmin
TypeScript
Local

encode_decode

Convert text to encoded formats like base64, URL, or HTML, and decode them back.

Instructions

Encode or decode text using various methods

Tool call template

Replace each placeholder with a value matching the input schema. Only required parameters are included; add optional parameters as needed.

{
  "id": 1,
  "jsonrpc": "2.0",
  "method": "tools/call",
  "params": {
    "arguments": {
      "text": "<text>",
      "method": "<method>"
    },
    "name": "encode_decode"
  }
}

Input Schema

NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
textYesText to encode/decode
methodYesEncoding/decoding method

Schema Changelog

Changes observed during successful MCP inspections.

  1. First observedv1.0.1

TDQS

B3.3/5.0
Behavior2/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

With no annotations, the description carries the full burden for behavioral traits, but it only states 'encode or decode' without details on side effects, idempotency, or return value. Minimal disclosure.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness5/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is a single sentence that efficiently conveys the core functionality with no unnecessary words. It is well-front-loaded and appropriately sized.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness3/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

For a simple tool with two parameters and no output schema, the description adequately states the purpose but omits details about the return value. It is minimally complete but could improve by mentioning the output.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters3/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema coverage is 100%, so the description does not need to explain parameters beyond what the schema already provides. It adds no additional meaning, thus baseline 3 applies.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose5/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states the tool's purpose: encoding or decoding text using various methods. It distinguishes itself from sibling tools like file operations and hash_text by focusing on text transformation.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines2/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

No guidance on when to use this tool versus alternatives, such as when to encode vs decode, or when to use encode_decode instead of hash_text. The description lacks usage context.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.

Deploy Server

Other Tools